Critical care by emergency physicians in American and English hospitals.

L G Graff, S Clark, M J Radford
{"title":"Critical care by emergency physicians in American and English hospitals.","authors":"L G Graff,&nbsp;S Clark,&nbsp;M J Radford","doi":"10.1136/emj.10.3.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The object of this study was to compare emergency physician critical care services in an American (A) and an English (E) Emergency Department (ED). A prospective case comparison trial was used. The study was carried out at two university affiliated community hospitals, one in the U.S.A and one in England. Subjects were consecutive patients triaged as requiring critical care services and subsequently admitted to the hospital ward (A, n = 17; E, n = 18) or the intensive/critical care unit ([ICU] A, n = 14; E, n = 24). The study time period was randomly selected 8-h shifts occurring over a 4-week period. All patients were treated by standard guidelines for critical care services at the study hospital emergency department. For all study patients mean length of stay was significantly longer for the American (233 min, 95% CI 201, 264) than the English ED (24 min, 95% CI 23, 25). American emergency physicians spent less total time providing physician services (19.2 min, 95% CI 16.8, 21.6) vs. (23 min, 95% CI 21.6, 24.4) than English emergency physicians. American emergency physicians spent less time with the patient than English emergency physicians: 12.4 min (95% CI 10.3, 14.5) vs. 17 min (95% CI 15.8, 18.2). American emergency physicians spent more time on the telephone 1.8 min (95% CI 1.4, 2.2) vs. 1.2 min (95% CI 1.1, 1.3), and in patient care discussions/order giving 1.8 min (95% CI 1.4, 2.2) vs. 1.1 min (95% CI .8, 1.4), There was no significant difference in time charting (3.2 min, 95% CI 2.8, 3.6 vs. 3.5 min, 95% CI 3.2, 3.8). Results did not vary significantly whether analysed subgroups or the whole study group. American emergency physicians provided 81% of their service during the first hour. There were delays at the American hospital until the physician saw the patient: 4.9 min (95% CI 2.5, 7.3) for patients admitted to the ICU/CVU (Cardiovascular Unit), and 9.2 min (95% CI 4.6, 13.8) for patients admitted to the ward. At the American hospital, ICU/CVU physicians provided additional physician services in the emergency department whether the patient was admitted to the ward (6.7 min, 95% CI 5.5, 7.9) or the ICU/CVU (12.1 min, 95% CI 8.8, 15.9). For patients admitted to the ICU/CVU 47% of the length of stay was spent waiting for a bed to become available after the decision to admit had been made. Emergency physicians at E provided critical care services almost continuously during a short stay in the ED. Emergency physicians at A provided services intermittently with most services during an initial period of stabilization. Further study is necessary to identify what factors contribute to these different approaches to critical care in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":77009,"journal":{"name":"Archives of emergency medicine","volume":"10 3","pages":"145-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/emj.10.3.145","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.10.3.145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

The object of this study was to compare emergency physician critical care services in an American (A) and an English (E) Emergency Department (ED). A prospective case comparison trial was used. The study was carried out at two university affiliated community hospitals, one in the U.S.A and one in England. Subjects were consecutive patients triaged as requiring critical care services and subsequently admitted to the hospital ward (A, n = 17; E, n = 18) or the intensive/critical care unit ([ICU] A, n = 14; E, n = 24). The study time period was randomly selected 8-h shifts occurring over a 4-week period. All patients were treated by standard guidelines for critical care services at the study hospital emergency department. For all study patients mean length of stay was significantly longer for the American (233 min, 95% CI 201, 264) than the English ED (24 min, 95% CI 23, 25). American emergency physicians spent less total time providing physician services (19.2 min, 95% CI 16.8, 21.6) vs. (23 min, 95% CI 21.6, 24.4) than English emergency physicians. American emergency physicians spent less time with the patient than English emergency physicians: 12.4 min (95% CI 10.3, 14.5) vs. 17 min (95% CI 15.8, 18.2). American emergency physicians spent more time on the telephone 1.8 min (95% CI 1.4, 2.2) vs. 1.2 min (95% CI 1.1, 1.3), and in patient care discussions/order giving 1.8 min (95% CI 1.4, 2.2) vs. 1.1 min (95% CI .8, 1.4), There was no significant difference in time charting (3.2 min, 95% CI 2.8, 3.6 vs. 3.5 min, 95% CI 3.2, 3.8). Results did not vary significantly whether analysed subgroups or the whole study group. American emergency physicians provided 81% of their service during the first hour. There were delays at the American hospital until the physician saw the patient: 4.9 min (95% CI 2.5, 7.3) for patients admitted to the ICU/CVU (Cardiovascular Unit), and 9.2 min (95% CI 4.6, 13.8) for patients admitted to the ward. At the American hospital, ICU/CVU physicians provided additional physician services in the emergency department whether the patient was admitted to the ward (6.7 min, 95% CI 5.5, 7.9) or the ICU/CVU (12.1 min, 95% CI 8.8, 15.9). For patients admitted to the ICU/CVU 47% of the length of stay was spent waiting for a bed to become available after the decision to admit had been made. Emergency physicians at E provided critical care services almost continuously during a short stay in the ED. Emergency physicians at A provided services intermittently with most services during an initial period of stabilization. Further study is necessary to identify what factors contribute to these different approaches to critical care in the ED.

美国和英国医院急诊医师的重症监护。
本研究的目的是比较急诊医师在美国(A)和英国(E)急诊科(ED)的重症监护服务。采用前瞻性病例比较试验。这项研究是在两所大学附属的社区医院进行的,一个在美国,一个在英国。研究对象是经分类为需要重症监护服务并随后入住医院病房的连续患者(A, n = 17;E组,n = 18)或重症监护病房([ICU] A组,n = 14;E, n = 24)。研究时间段是随机选择的,在4周的时间内,每班8小时。所有患者均按研究医院急诊科重症监护服务的标准指南进行治疗。在所有研究患者中,美国ED的平均住院时间(233分钟,95% CI 201, 264)明显长于英国ED(24分钟,95% CI 23, 25)。美国急诊医生提供内科服务的总时间少于英国急诊医生(19.2分钟,95% CI 16.8, 21.6)和(23分钟,95% CI 21.6, 24.4)。美国急诊医生与患者相处的时间少于英国急诊医生:12.4分钟(95% CI: 10.3, 14.5) vs. 17分钟(95% CI: 15.8, 18.2)。美国急诊医生在电话上花费的时间更多,分别为1.8分钟(95% CI 1.4, 2.2)和1.2分钟(95% CI 1.1, 1.3),在患者护理讨论/订单上花费的时间为1.8分钟(95% CI 1.4, 2.2)和1.1分钟(95% CI 0.8, 1.4),在时间图表上没有显著差异(3.2分钟,95% CI 2.8, 3.6比3.5分钟,95% CI 3.2, 3.8)。无论是分析亚组还是整个研究组,结果都没有显著差异。美国急诊医生在第一个小时内提供了81%的服务。在美国医院,直到医生见到病人有延误:入住ICU/CVU(心血管病房)的病人有4.9分钟(95% CI 2.5, 7.3),入住病房的病人有9.2分钟(95% CI 4.6, 13.8)。在美国医院,ICU/CVU医生在急诊科提供额外的医生服务,无论患者是住在病房(6.7分钟,95% CI 5.5, 7.9)还是ICU/CVU(12.1分钟,95% CI 8.8, 15.9)。对于入住ICU/CVU的患者,47%的住院时间是在决定入院后等待床位可用。急诊医生在急诊科短暂停留期间几乎不间断地提供重症监护服务。a的急诊医生在最初稳定期间间歇性地提供大多数服务。进一步的研究是必要的,以确定哪些因素有助于这些不同的方法在急诊科重症监护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信