The incidence of reporting consent rates in nursing research articles.

S Douglas, J Briones, C Chronister
{"title":"The incidence of reporting consent rates in nursing research articles.","authors":"S Douglas,&nbsp;J Briones,&nbsp;C Chronister","doi":"10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00291.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study described the incidence of reporting consent rates (CRs) in nursing research articles, ascertained the mean CR for nursing research articles, ascertained differences between those studies that reported a CR and those that did not report a CR, and compared studies that used clinical populations to studies that used nonclinical populations. Research articles (371) from three nursing research journals were examined. Results showed that: (a) 40.7 percent of articles reported a CR, (b) the mean CR was 71.8 percent, (c) 41.1 percent reported inadequate CRs, (d) studies reporting a CR differed from those that did not on five of nine variables, and (e) studies employing clinical populations reported higher consent rates than did studies that employed nonclinical populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":77169,"journal":{"name":"Image--the journal of nursing scholarship","volume":"26 1","pages":"35-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00291.x","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Image--the journal of nursing scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00291.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The study described the incidence of reporting consent rates (CRs) in nursing research articles, ascertained the mean CR for nursing research articles, ascertained differences between those studies that reported a CR and those that did not report a CR, and compared studies that used clinical populations to studies that used nonclinical populations. Research articles (371) from three nursing research journals were examined. Results showed that: (a) 40.7 percent of articles reported a CR, (b) the mean CR was 71.8 percent, (c) 41.1 percent reported inadequate CRs, (d) studies reporting a CR differed from those that did not on five of nine variables, and (e) studies employing clinical populations reported higher consent rates than did studies that employed nonclinical populations.

护理研究文章中报告同意率的发生率。
本研究描述了护理研究文章中报告同意率(CR)的发生率,确定了护理研究文章的平均CR,确定了报告CR和未报告CR的研究之间的差异,并比较了使用临床人群的研究和使用非临床人群的研究。研究论文(371篇)来自三个护理研究期刊。结果显示:(a) 40.7%的文章报告了CR, (b)平均CR为71.8%,(c) 41.1%的文章报告了CR不足,(d)报告CR的研究与没有报告CR的研究在9个变量中的5个变量上有所不同,(e)使用临床人群的研究报告的同意率高于使用非临床人群的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信