Application of the double-indicator technique for measurement of blood-brain barrier permeability in humans.

G M Knudsen
{"title":"Application of the double-indicator technique for measurement of blood-brain barrier permeability in humans.","authors":"G M Knudsen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review examines and evaluates the double-indicator technique for utilization in quantitative measurements of the transport of substances across the human blood-brain barrier (BBB). The classic double-indicator method and its limitations are described along with a new approach for correction of capillary heterogeneity and tracer backflux. This approach considers the total course of the venous outflow curves and involves a short-time experiment model that incorporates calculations of parameters for transport from the blood into the brain and from the brain back to the blood, for the uptake of neurons and glia cells, and for the tracer distribution volume. A modification of the double-indicator technique with intravenous instead of intracarotid bolus injection is discussed along with advantages and limitations of this technique. The application of the method is described and examples are given for D-glucose as well as for some large neutral amino acids and flow tracers. On the basis of the model, it is demonstrated that after crossing the BBB, D-glucose distributes in the brain interstitial fluid volume, and already at the peak of the glucose outflow curves, the apparent extraction is significantly influenced by backflux from the brain. For large neutral amino acids, the permeability from the interstitial fluid space back to the blood is approximately 10 times higher than the permeability from the blood into the brain. Such a difference in permeabilities across the BBB can almost entirely be ascribed to the effect of a nonlinear transport system combined with a relatively small brain amino acid metabolism. This high and rapid backflux causes methodological problems when estimating blood-to-brain transfer of amino acids with traditional in vivo methods. The method is also evaluated for high-permeable substances. Water and the two flow tracers ethyl cysteinate dimer and hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime and the obtained values for brain extraction and distribution volume compare well with those obtained by other methods. Finally, ethical aspects and the future role and possibilities of the double-indicator technique are discussed and related to other methods for determination of BBB permeabilities in the living human brain.</p>","PeriodicalId":9739,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular and brain metabolism reviews","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular and brain metabolism reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review examines and evaluates the double-indicator technique for utilization in quantitative measurements of the transport of substances across the human blood-brain barrier (BBB). The classic double-indicator method and its limitations are described along with a new approach for correction of capillary heterogeneity and tracer backflux. This approach considers the total course of the venous outflow curves and involves a short-time experiment model that incorporates calculations of parameters for transport from the blood into the brain and from the brain back to the blood, for the uptake of neurons and glia cells, and for the tracer distribution volume. A modification of the double-indicator technique with intravenous instead of intracarotid bolus injection is discussed along with advantages and limitations of this technique. The application of the method is described and examples are given for D-glucose as well as for some large neutral amino acids and flow tracers. On the basis of the model, it is demonstrated that after crossing the BBB, D-glucose distributes in the brain interstitial fluid volume, and already at the peak of the glucose outflow curves, the apparent extraction is significantly influenced by backflux from the brain. For large neutral amino acids, the permeability from the interstitial fluid space back to the blood is approximately 10 times higher than the permeability from the blood into the brain. Such a difference in permeabilities across the BBB can almost entirely be ascribed to the effect of a nonlinear transport system combined with a relatively small brain amino acid metabolism. This high and rapid backflux causes methodological problems when estimating blood-to-brain transfer of amino acids with traditional in vivo methods. The method is also evaluated for high-permeable substances. Water and the two flow tracers ethyl cysteinate dimer and hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime and the obtained values for brain extraction and distribution volume compare well with those obtained by other methods. Finally, ethical aspects and the future role and possibilities of the double-indicator technique are discussed and related to other methods for determination of BBB permeabilities in the living human brain.

双指标技术在测定人血脑屏障通透性中的应用。
本文综述了双指标技术在定量测量物质通过人血脑屏障(BBB)的运输中的应用。介绍了经典的双指示法及其局限性,并提出了一种校正毛细管非均质性和示踪剂回通量的新方法。该方法考虑了静脉流出曲线的整个过程,并包括一个短期实验模型,该模型结合了从血液进入大脑和从大脑返回血液的运输参数的计算,用于神经元和胶质细胞的摄取,以及示踪剂分布体积。本文讨论了用静脉注射代替颈动脉内注射双指示剂技术的改进,以及该技术的优点和局限性。介绍了该方法的应用,并举例说明了d -葡萄糖以及一些大的中性氨基酸和流动示踪剂。在模型的基础上,我们发现d -葡萄糖在穿过血脑屏障后,分布在脑间质液容积中,并且已经处于葡萄糖流出曲线的峰值,明显的提取受到脑回流的显著影响。对于大的中性氨基酸,从组织液空间返回血液的渗透性大约是血液进入大脑的渗透性的10倍。血脑屏障通透性的差异几乎可以完全归因于非线性运输系统与相对较小的脑氨基酸代谢的影响。当用传统的体内方法估计氨基酸从血到脑的转移时,这种高而快速的回流导致了方法学上的问题。该方法还对高渗透性物质进行了评估。水和两种流动示踪剂半胱氨酸乙酯二聚体和六甲基丙烯胺肟,得到的脑提取和分布体积值与其他方法得到的值比较好。最后,讨论了伦理问题以及双指标技术的未来作用和可能性,并将其与其他测定人脑血脑屏障通透性的方法联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信