An open comparative study of the analgesic effects of tenoxicam and diclofenac sodium after third molar surgery.

J A Roelofse, P van der Bijl, J J Joubert
{"title":"An open comparative study of the analgesic effects of tenoxicam and diclofenac sodium after third molar surgery.","authors":"J A Roelofse,&nbsp;P van der Bijl,&nbsp;J J Joubert","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tenoxicam and diclofenac sodium were compared as analgesics following the surgical removal of third molars. Twenty-five patients between the ages 17 and 29 years were randomly allocated into two groups. Patients in group A received a single intraoperative intravenous (i.v.) injection of 20 mg of tenoxicam followed by a 20-mg tablet given the evening after the operation; thereafter, one 20-mg tablet was given once daily for the next 6 days. Group B received a single intraoperative intramuscular injection of 75 mg of diclofenac sodium followed by a 50-mg tablet 4 to 6 hours postoperatively and during the evening; thereafter, a 50-mg tablet was taken three times daily for the next 6 days. Pain was postoperatively measured hourly for 4 hours and later in the evening. Pain was also measured in the mornings and evenings for the next 6 days. The highest pain scores were obtained 1 hour postoperatively for both groups. During the first 3 hours following administration, patients in the tenoxicam group experienced significantly more pain than those in the diclofenac group. Preoperatively, both treatments showed identical efficacy after 3 hours. It is therefore suggested that a 40-mg dose of i.v. tenoxicam should be administered at induction of anesthesia to achieve a higher level of analgesia in the immediate postoperative phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":76997,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & pain control in dentistry","volume":"2 4","pages":"217-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia & pain control in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tenoxicam and diclofenac sodium were compared as analgesics following the surgical removal of third molars. Twenty-five patients between the ages 17 and 29 years were randomly allocated into two groups. Patients in group A received a single intraoperative intravenous (i.v.) injection of 20 mg of tenoxicam followed by a 20-mg tablet given the evening after the operation; thereafter, one 20-mg tablet was given once daily for the next 6 days. Group B received a single intraoperative intramuscular injection of 75 mg of diclofenac sodium followed by a 50-mg tablet 4 to 6 hours postoperatively and during the evening; thereafter, a 50-mg tablet was taken three times daily for the next 6 days. Pain was postoperatively measured hourly for 4 hours and later in the evening. Pain was also measured in the mornings and evenings for the next 6 days. The highest pain scores were obtained 1 hour postoperatively for both groups. During the first 3 hours following administration, patients in the tenoxicam group experienced significantly more pain than those in the diclofenac group. Preoperatively, both treatments showed identical efficacy after 3 hours. It is therefore suggested that a 40-mg dose of i.v. tenoxicam should be administered at induction of anesthesia to achieve a higher level of analgesia in the immediate postoperative phase.

替诺昔康与双氯芬酸钠第三磨牙术后镇痛效果的开放性比较研究。
比较替诺昔康和双氯芬酸钠在第三磨牙手术切除后的镇痛作用。25名年龄在17岁至29岁之间的患者被随机分为两组。A组患者术中单次静脉注射替诺昔康20mg,术后晚给予片剂20mg;此后,在接下来的6天内,每天服用一次20毫克片剂。B组患者术中单次肌内注射双氯芬酸钠75 mg,术后4 ~ 6小时及晚间分别给予50 mg片剂;此后,在接下来的6天内,每天服用三次50毫克的片剂。术后4小时及晚间每小时测量一次疼痛。在接下来的6天中,还在早晚测量疼痛。两组患者术后1小时疼痛评分最高。在给药后的前3小时,替诺昔康组患者的疼痛明显多于双氯芬酸组。术前3小时,两种治疗效果相同。因此,建议在麻醉诱导时静脉注射40mg替诺昔康,以便在术后立即达到较高的镇痛水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书