Thallium-201 lung uptake: comparison of an automatic and a manual method of ROI drawing.

M Castellani, A Chiti, L C Giovanella, A Bestetti, A Lomuscio, G L Tarolo
{"title":"Thallium-201 lung uptake: comparison of an automatic and a manual method of ROI drawing.","authors":"M Castellani,&nbsp;A Chiti,&nbsp;L C Giovanella,&nbsp;A Bestetti,&nbsp;A Lomuscio,&nbsp;G L Tarolo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An automatic method for ROI drawing to measure 201TI lung uptake after stress testing in planar and tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging, was compared with the more commonly used manual method. A linear correlation in the lung/heart ratio (LHR) and lung washout (LWO) data, obtained in planar and SPECT images with the two methods, was found. Pearson's correlation coefficient between the automatic and manual methods was highly significant both for LHR and for LWO. For LHR we found a high linear correlation between the two methods in the planar anterior (r = 0.71, p < 0.001), SPECT anterior (r = 0.84, p < 0.001), and SPECT LAO (r = 0.96, p < 0.001) views. The analysis of LWO data showed a good linear correlation for the planar anterior (r = 0.84, p < 0.001), SPECT anterior (r = 0.66, p < 0.005) and SPECT LAO (r = 0.79, p < 0.001) views. Furthermore, comparison by the student's t test of the averages of the LHR and LWO values obtained in the same views but with different methods was performed. The advantages and the critical issues associated with the automatic method are discussed; it appears to be quick and easy to perform and to be equivalent to the more time-consuming method based on a manual definition of left lung ROI.</p>","PeriodicalId":77217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear biology and medicine (Turin, Italy : 1991)","volume":"37 4","pages":"213-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear biology and medicine (Turin, Italy : 1991)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An automatic method for ROI drawing to measure 201TI lung uptake after stress testing in planar and tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging, was compared with the more commonly used manual method. A linear correlation in the lung/heart ratio (LHR) and lung washout (LWO) data, obtained in planar and SPECT images with the two methods, was found. Pearson's correlation coefficient between the automatic and manual methods was highly significant both for LHR and for LWO. For LHR we found a high linear correlation between the two methods in the planar anterior (r = 0.71, p < 0.001), SPECT anterior (r = 0.84, p < 0.001), and SPECT LAO (r = 0.96, p < 0.001) views. The analysis of LWO data showed a good linear correlation for the planar anterior (r = 0.84, p < 0.001), SPECT anterior (r = 0.66, p < 0.005) and SPECT LAO (r = 0.79, p < 0.001) views. Furthermore, comparison by the student's t test of the averages of the LHR and LWO values obtained in the same views but with different methods was performed. The advantages and the critical issues associated with the automatic method are discussed; it appears to be quick and easy to perform and to be equivalent to the more time-consuming method based on a manual definition of left lung ROI.

铊-201肺摄取:自动和手动ROI绘制方法的比较。
在平面和层析心肌灌注成像应力测试后,用ROI绘图自动测量201TI肺摄取的方法与更常用的人工方法进行比较。发现两种方法在平面和SPECT图像上获得的肺/心脏比(LHR)和肺冲洗(LWO)数据呈线性相关。对于LHR和LWO,自动方法和人工方法的Pearson相关系数均极显著。对于LHR,我们发现两种方法在平面前视图(r = 0.71, p < 0.001)、SPECT前视图(r = 0.84, p < 0.001)和SPECT LAO视图(r = 0.96, p < 0.001)上具有高度的线性相关性。LWO数据分析显示,平面前位(r = 0.84, p < 0.001)、SPECT前位(r = 0.66, p < 0.005)和SPECT LAO (r = 0.79, p < 0.001)影像具有良好的线性相关性。此外,通过学生t检验比较了在相同视图中使用不同方法获得的LHR和LWO值的平均值。讨论了自动化方法的优点和相关的关键问题;它似乎是快速和容易执行,相当于更耗时的方法,基于手动定义的左肺ROI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信