[Medical magic of Paracelsus and Paracelsus followers: weapon salve].

W D Müller-Jahncke
{"title":"[Medical magic of Paracelsus and Paracelsus followers: weapon salve].","authors":"W D Müller-Jahncke","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The doctrine of 'transplantatio morborum' may be considered a branch of the 'magia naturalis'-philosophy which was widespread in the sixteenth century. According to this doctrine, ailments and remedies can be transferred from one body to another. A further example of this field of medicine is gun salve, which we find mentioned particularly in the works of the Paracelsists of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Even though salve of various types had already been used for some time in the treatment of stab wounds, gun salve was imputed to have magnetic properties which gave rise to 'actio in distans', whereby the smearing of gun salve onto the weapon caused the wound to be healed. An early example of a description of its formula can be found in the first book of the 'Archidoxis magica': one of the works which have been wrongly attributed to Paracelsus. Early in the seventeenth century, this formula for gun salve--frequently with modifications--found its way into the writings of the followers of Paracelsian doctrine: of Oswald Croll, for example, or Rudolph Goclenius. When the concept of 'actio in distans' was propounded, an argument soon developed as to whether gun salve should be classified under 'magia naturalis' or 'magia daemoniaca'. Determined opposition to Goclenius was proferred in the person of Jean Roberti, a Belgian Jesuit who accused the Protestant Goclenius of consorting with demons. A number of treatises appeared in close succession, with Johann Baptist van Helmont emerging as the mediator in the argument. Yet he too came under attack at the hand of the Jesuit Roberti, with the result that, at least by the time Athanasius Kircher had also become embroiled in the debate, the dispute was pursued principally between orthodox Trentino Catholicism and heterodox Protestantism. An analysis of the writings on the subject of gun salve demonstrates how easily a discussion which was originally of a purely medical, scientific nature could lead to a religious controversy in that denominational age.</p>","PeriodicalId":76566,"journal":{"name":"Sudhoffs Archiv; Zeitschrift fur Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Beihefte","volume":" 31","pages":"43-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sudhoffs Archiv; Zeitschrift fur Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Beihefte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The doctrine of 'transplantatio morborum' may be considered a branch of the 'magia naturalis'-philosophy which was widespread in the sixteenth century. According to this doctrine, ailments and remedies can be transferred from one body to another. A further example of this field of medicine is gun salve, which we find mentioned particularly in the works of the Paracelsists of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Even though salve of various types had already been used for some time in the treatment of stab wounds, gun salve was imputed to have magnetic properties which gave rise to 'actio in distans', whereby the smearing of gun salve onto the weapon caused the wound to be healed. An early example of a description of its formula can be found in the first book of the 'Archidoxis magica': one of the works which have been wrongly attributed to Paracelsus. Early in the seventeenth century, this formula for gun salve--frequently with modifications--found its way into the writings of the followers of Paracelsian doctrine: of Oswald Croll, for example, or Rudolph Goclenius. When the concept of 'actio in distans' was propounded, an argument soon developed as to whether gun salve should be classified under 'magia naturalis' or 'magia daemoniaca'. Determined opposition to Goclenius was proferred in the person of Jean Roberti, a Belgian Jesuit who accused the Protestant Goclenius of consorting with demons. A number of treatises appeared in close succession, with Johann Baptist van Helmont emerging as the mediator in the argument. Yet he too came under attack at the hand of the Jesuit Roberti, with the result that, at least by the time Athanasius Kircher had also become embroiled in the debate, the dispute was pursued principally between orthodox Trentino Catholicism and heterodox Protestantism. An analysis of the writings on the subject of gun salve demonstrates how easily a discussion which was originally of a purely medical, scientific nature could lead to a religious controversy in that denominational age.

[巴拉塞尔士和巴拉塞尔士追随者的医疗魔法:武器药膏]。
“胚胎移植”学说可以被认为是“自然魔法”哲学的一个分支,这种哲学在16世纪很流行。根据这一学说,疾病和治疗方法可以从一个身体转移到另一个身体。这一医学领域的另一个例子是枪支药膏,我们在17世纪和18世纪的paracelist的作品中特别提到过。尽管各种各样的药膏已经用于治疗刺伤有一段时间了,但人们认为药膏具有磁性,可以产生“远距离作用”,从而将药膏涂抹在武器上,伤口就会愈合。其公式描述的一个早期例子可以在“阿奇多西斯魔法”的第一本书中找到:其中一个被错误地归因于巴拉塞尔苏斯的作品。早在17世纪,这个枪械药膏的配方——经常经过修改——就出现在帕拉塞尔教义的追随者的著作中:比如奥斯瓦尔德·克罗尔(Oswald Croll)或鲁道夫·戈克伦纽斯(Rudolph Goclenius)。当“远距离行动”的概念被提出时,一场争论很快就发展起来了,即枪支药膏应该被归类为“魔法自然”还是“魔法daemoniaca”。比利时耶稣会士让·罗伯提(Jean Roberti)对戈克伦纽斯提出了坚决反对,他指责新教徒戈克伦纽斯与恶魔交往。许多论文相继出现,约翰·施洗德·范·赫尔蒙特在争论中扮演了调解人的角色。然而,他也受到了耶稣会士罗伯提的攻击,结果,至少在亚他那修·基歇尔也卷入这场争论的时候,这场争论主要是在正统的特伦蒂诺天主教和异端的新教之间进行的。对枪支药膏主题的著作的分析表明,在那个教派时代,原本纯粹属于医学和科学性质的讨论是多么容易导致宗教争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信