Unmodified and recombinant strains of Lactobacillus plantarum are rapidly lost from the rumen by protozoal predation.

R Sharp, G P Hazlewood, H J Gilbert, A G O'Donnell
{"title":"Unmodified and recombinant strains of Lactobacillus plantarum are rapidly lost from the rumen by protozoal predation.","authors":"R Sharp,&nbsp;G P Hazlewood,&nbsp;H J Gilbert,&nbsp;A G O'Donnell","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2672.1994.tb01605.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A genetically-manipulated strain of Lactobacillus plantarum and the unmodified parent strain were introduced into the rumen of sheep at an initial inoculum level of 1 x 10(7) cfu ml-1 of rumen fluid. There were no significant differences between the viable counts of the two inoculants throughout a 24 h sampling period. The rates of loss were 0.36 and 0.29 h-1 (proportion of colony-forming units lost, measured over the first 2 h) for the parent strain and recombinant strain respectively, and within 24 h of inoculation neither of the strains were detectable in rumen fluid. Further experiments in vitro revealed that the inoculants persisted in sterile rumen fluid with a loss rate of 0.044 and 0.057 h-1 for the parent strain and the recombinant strain respectively. Incubations with rumen fluid alone, protozoa-free rumen fluid and protozoa-enriched rumen fluid revealed that protozoal predation was the most significant factor in the loss of the introduced population. The loss rates from protozoa-free rumen fluid were not significantly different (P < 0.05) from those observed in sterile rumen fluid.</p>","PeriodicalId":22599,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of applied bacteriology","volume":"76 2","pages":"110-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1994.tb01605.x","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of applied bacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1994.tb01605.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

A genetically-manipulated strain of Lactobacillus plantarum and the unmodified parent strain were introduced into the rumen of sheep at an initial inoculum level of 1 x 10(7) cfu ml-1 of rumen fluid. There were no significant differences between the viable counts of the two inoculants throughout a 24 h sampling period. The rates of loss were 0.36 and 0.29 h-1 (proportion of colony-forming units lost, measured over the first 2 h) for the parent strain and recombinant strain respectively, and within 24 h of inoculation neither of the strains were detectable in rumen fluid. Further experiments in vitro revealed that the inoculants persisted in sterile rumen fluid with a loss rate of 0.044 and 0.057 h-1 for the parent strain and the recombinant strain respectively. Incubations with rumen fluid alone, protozoa-free rumen fluid and protozoa-enriched rumen fluid revealed that protozoal predation was the most significant factor in the loss of the introduced population. The loss rates from protozoa-free rumen fluid were not significantly different (P < 0.05) from those observed in sterile rumen fluid.

未经修饰的和重组的植物乳杆菌菌株在瘤胃中被原生动物捕食而迅速消失。
以1 × 10(7) cfu ml-1的瘤胃液初始接种量,将植物乳杆菌基因修饰菌株和未修饰亲本菌株分别引入绵羊瘤胃。在24 h的采样周期内,两种接种剂的活菌数没有显著差异。亲本菌株和重组菌株的菌落损失率分别为0.36和0.29 h-1(在前2 h内测量的菌落形成单位损失比例),接种后24 h内瘤胃液中均未检测到这两种菌株。进一步的体外实验表明,接种剂在无菌瘤胃液中持续存在,亲本菌株和重组菌株的损失率分别为0.044和0.057 h-1。单独的瘤胃液、不含原生动物的瘤胃液和富含原生动物的瘤胃液孵育表明,原生动物的捕食是引入种群损失的最重要因素。无原生动物瘤胃液的损失率与无菌瘤胃液无显著差异(P < 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信