Carotid stenosis and carotid endarterectomy.

I Meissner, F B Meyer
{"title":"Carotid stenosis and carotid endarterectomy.","authors":"I Meissner,&nbsp;F B Meyer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review focuses on the natural history of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis and on the risk/benefit ratio of carotid endarterectomy. Five randomized trials for symptomatic stenosis and four trials for asymptomatic carotid occlusive disease are reviewed. Carotid endarterectomy has been proved effective in reducing stroke risk in symptomatic 70-99% stenosis. Conclusive results are still pending for moderate symptomatic stenosis and the asymptomatic lesion. Surgical controversies and techniques are discussed. Algorithms for management of symptomatic and asymptomatic stenosis are offered.</p>","PeriodicalId":9739,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular and brain metabolism reviews","volume":"6 2","pages":"163-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular and brain metabolism reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review focuses on the natural history of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis and on the risk/benefit ratio of carotid endarterectomy. Five randomized trials for symptomatic stenosis and four trials for asymptomatic carotid occlusive disease are reviewed. Carotid endarterectomy has been proved effective in reducing stroke risk in symptomatic 70-99% stenosis. Conclusive results are still pending for moderate symptomatic stenosis and the asymptomatic lesion. Surgical controversies and techniques are discussed. Algorithms for management of symptomatic and asymptomatic stenosis are offered.

颈动脉狭窄和颈动脉内膜切除术。
本文综述了有症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄的自然病史,以及颈动脉内膜切除术的风险/收益比。本文回顾了5项针对症状性狭窄的随机试验和4项针对无症状性颈动脉闭塞疾病的随机试验。颈动脉内膜切除术已被证明可有效降低症状性狭窄患者70-99%的卒中风险。中度症状性狭窄和无症状病变的结论性结果仍有待观察。讨论了手术争议和技术。算法管理的有症状和无症状的狭窄提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信