Once daily loratadine versus astemizole once daily.

Annals of allergy Pub Date : 1994-08-01
P Chervinsky, J Georgitis, C Banov, P Boggs, R Vande Souwe, S Greenstein
{"title":"Once daily loratadine versus astemizole once daily.","authors":"P Chervinsky,&nbsp;J Georgitis,&nbsp;C Banov,&nbsp;P Boggs,&nbsp;R Vande Souwe,&nbsp;S Greenstein","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of loratadine and astemizole for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. A total of 167 adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis was enrolled in a randomized double-blind, parallel group study. Patients were treated once daily for 2 months during a spring allergy season. Both treatment groups showed significant reduction of symptoms (P < .01) from baseline. The physicians' and patients' evaluations of response to treatment were generally higher for loratadine than astemizole but only reached statistical significance (P < .05) at the 1-week evaluation. Astemizole-treated patients showed statistically significantly more weight gain than did loratadine-treated patients. Loratadine and astemizole were comparable in reducing the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Both treatments were well tolerated, although less weight gain was observed in patients treated with loratadine.</p>","PeriodicalId":7931,"journal":{"name":"Annals of allergy","volume":"73 2","pages":"109-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of loratadine and astemizole for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. A total of 167 adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis was enrolled in a randomized double-blind, parallel group study. Patients were treated once daily for 2 months during a spring allergy season. Both treatment groups showed significant reduction of symptoms (P < .01) from baseline. The physicians' and patients' evaluations of response to treatment were generally higher for loratadine than astemizole but only reached statistical significance (P < .05) at the 1-week evaluation. Astemizole-treated patients showed statistically significantly more weight gain than did loratadine-treated patients. Loratadine and astemizole were comparable in reducing the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Both treatments were well tolerated, although less weight gain was observed in patients treated with loratadine.

每日一次的氯雷他定和阿斯咪唑。
本研究旨在比较氯雷他定和阿司咪唑治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效和安全性。167名患有季节性变应性鼻炎的成年患者被纳入一项随机、双盲、平行组研究。患者在春季过敏季节每天治疗一次,持续2个月。两个治疗组的症状均较基线显著减轻(P < 0.01)。医生和患者对氯雷他定治疗效果的评价普遍高于阿司咪唑,但仅在第1周评价时达到统计学意义(P < 0.05)。阿司咪唑治疗的患者体重增加明显多于氯雷他定治疗的患者。氯雷他定和阿司咪唑在减轻季节性变应性鼻炎的体征和症状方面具有可比性。两种治疗均具有良好的耐受性,但服用氯雷他定的患者体重增加较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信