Colorectal cancer hepatic metastases: the surgeons role.

C R Shumate
{"title":"Colorectal cancer hepatic metastases: the surgeons role.","authors":"C R Shumate","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liver metastases are not uniformly fatal. A group of patients exists that will benefit from therapy directed at the liver either with surgical resection, intra-arterial chemotherapy or a combination of both. (Fig 2) All patients should be evaluated for the possibility of surgical resection since it can provide a 5-year survival of 25 to 40%, or hepatic arterial infusion therapy since response rates are higher and toxicity lower than systemic chemotherapy. When metastases are discovered simultaneously with the primary tumor, consideration should be given to concomitant treatment of both the primary and the liver if the patient is a suitable operative candidate and the resection will not entail more than a wedge or a left lateral lobe resection. Metastases discovered on follow-up of the primary tumor may be immediately addressed with surgical resection or hepatic artery infusion pump placement if the disease-free interval has been greater than 1-2 years. When the disease free interval has been less than a year, systemic chemotherapy is probably more prudent to allow time for manifestation of extra hepatic disease. If no extra-hepatic metastases become manifested after 6 months of systemic chemotherapy, then regional chemotherapy or resection should be considered. Intrahepatic progression on systemic chemotherapy is not a contraindication to hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy since the metastases may still respond. This approach allows patients manifesting extrahepatic disease while on systemic chemotherapy to be spared an operative procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":76987,"journal":{"name":"Alabama medicine : journal of the Medical Association of the State of Alabama","volume":"63 8","pages":"15-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alabama medicine : journal of the Medical Association of the State of Alabama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Liver metastases are not uniformly fatal. A group of patients exists that will benefit from therapy directed at the liver either with surgical resection, intra-arterial chemotherapy or a combination of both. (Fig 2) All patients should be evaluated for the possibility of surgical resection since it can provide a 5-year survival of 25 to 40%, or hepatic arterial infusion therapy since response rates are higher and toxicity lower than systemic chemotherapy. When metastases are discovered simultaneously with the primary tumor, consideration should be given to concomitant treatment of both the primary and the liver if the patient is a suitable operative candidate and the resection will not entail more than a wedge or a left lateral lobe resection. Metastases discovered on follow-up of the primary tumor may be immediately addressed with surgical resection or hepatic artery infusion pump placement if the disease-free interval has been greater than 1-2 years. When the disease free interval has been less than a year, systemic chemotherapy is probably more prudent to allow time for manifestation of extra hepatic disease. If no extra-hepatic metastases become manifested after 6 months of systemic chemotherapy, then regional chemotherapy or resection should be considered. Intrahepatic progression on systemic chemotherapy is not a contraindication to hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy since the metastases may still respond. This approach allows patients manifesting extrahepatic disease while on systemic chemotherapy to be spared an operative procedure.

结直肠癌肝转移:外科医生的作用。
肝转移并不总是致命的。存在一组患者将受益于针对肝脏的治疗,无论是手术切除,动脉内化疗还是两者结合。(图2)所有患者都应评估手术切除的可能性,因为它可以提供25 - 40%的5年生存率,或肝动脉输注治疗,因为反应率更高,毒性低于全身化疗。当转移与原发肿瘤同时发现时,如果患者适合手术,并且切除不需要超过楔形或左外侧叶切除,则应考虑原发和肝脏的联合治疗。在原发肿瘤的随访中发现转移,如果无病间隔大于1-2年,可以立即手术切除或放置肝动脉输注泵。当无病间隔时间少于一年时,全身化疗可能更谨慎,以便有时间发现肝外疾病的表现。如果全身化疗6个月后未出现肝外转移,则应考虑局部化疗或切除。全身化疗的肝内进展不是肝动脉输注化疗的禁忌症,因为转移瘤仍可能有反应。这种方法允许在全身化疗时表现为肝外疾病的患者免于手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信