Agreement between telephone survey and medical record data for the elderly patient.

Family practice research journal Pub Date : 1994-03-01
J N Kvale, W R Gillanders, T F Buss, D Gemmel, A Crenesse, J Griffiths-Marnejon
{"title":"Agreement between telephone survey and medical record data for the elderly patient.","authors":"J N Kvale,&nbsp;W R Gillanders,&nbsp;T F Buss,&nbsp;D Gemmel,&nbsp;A Crenesse,&nbsp;J Griffiths-Marnejon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compares agreement between telephone survey and ambulatory medical record data for an elderly patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records and telephone survey responses are used to compare health status (chronic medical condition, symptomatology, and functional status) of 142 elderly patients randomly selected from a family practice residency and a geriatric fellowship practice. Chart abstraction was performed by two resident and two faculty physicians after a training period designed to assure high inter-reviewer reliability. Telephone surveys were completed by two professional interviewers. Health status measures were taken from standard, published instruments. The kappa statistic was used to measure the agreement between medical record and survey data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, there is little agreement between the medical record and the telephone survey results on chronic medical condition, symptomatology, and functional status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical records abstractions and telephone survey methodologies did not yield comparable health status data when applied to the same elderly patient population. Functional status assessment and symptomatology are particularly problematic, but even the presence or absence of chronic diseases is often inconsistent in the two data sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":77127,"journal":{"name":"Family practice research journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"29-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study compares agreement between telephone survey and ambulatory medical record data for an elderly patient population.

Methods: Medical records and telephone survey responses are used to compare health status (chronic medical condition, symptomatology, and functional status) of 142 elderly patients randomly selected from a family practice residency and a geriatric fellowship practice. Chart abstraction was performed by two resident and two faculty physicians after a training period designed to assure high inter-reviewer reliability. Telephone surveys were completed by two professional interviewers. Health status measures were taken from standard, published instruments. The kappa statistic was used to measure the agreement between medical record and survey data.

Results: Overall, there is little agreement between the medical record and the telephone survey results on chronic medical condition, symptomatology, and functional status.

Conclusions: Medical records abstractions and telephone survey methodologies did not yield comparable health status data when applied to the same elderly patient population. Functional status assessment and symptomatology are particularly problematic, but even the presence or absence of chronic diseases is often inconsistent in the two data sources.

老年患者电话调查与病历数据的一致性。
目的:本研究比较电话调查与门诊病历资料对老年患者群体的一致性。方法:采用病历和电话调查问卷对随机选择的142例家庭住院医师和老年联科医师的老年患者的健康状况(慢性疾病、症状和功能状况)进行比较。图表抽象由两名住院医师和两名教员医师在经过一段旨在确保高审稿人间可靠性的培训后完成。电话调查由两名专业采访者完成。健康状况措施取自已公布的标准工具。采用kappa统计量衡量病案与调查资料的一致性。结果:总体而言,病历与电话调查结果在慢性医疗状况、症状和功能状态方面几乎没有一致之处。结论:医疗记录摘要和电话调查方法在应用于同一老年患者人群时不能产生可比的健康状况数据。功能状态评估和症状学尤其有问题,但即使是慢性病的存在与否,这两个数据来源也往往不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信