An autopsy-based quality assessment program for improvement of diagnostic accuracy.

R B Hill, R E Anderson
{"title":"An autopsy-based quality assessment program for improvement of diagnostic accuracy.","authors":"R B Hill,&nbsp;R E Anderson","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/5.4.351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A program for quality assessment of medical diagnostics is proposed, based on detailed, ongoing comparison of clinical diagnoses with autopsy diagnoses. The model requires that the autopsy service itself be subjected to quality control to assure the reliability of the autopsy findings, including the quality of diagnoses made postmortem, and the quality of autopsy reports. Discrepancies between premortem and postmortem diagnoses are classified as to cause and magnitude; for each disease, the total diagnostic experience is collected, and sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnostics are computed. These are compared with control ranges of sensitivity and specificity, prospectively arrived at through analysis of thousands of cases. Statistically acceptable sampling for autopsy, and review of findings by an independent body are also discussed. The findings generated by this program would be of great value in programs for quality improvement of medical care. The model has the following advantages: (1) it recognises that there is an unavoidable baseline of diagnostic errors; (2) the control levels, based on current medical practice, are prospectively established; (3) it avoids placing blame in a single case; and (4) it provides a fairly high power scrutiny that can focus on diagnostics for single diseases rather than the entire spectrum of medical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":77341,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","volume":"5 4","pages":"351-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/intqhc/5.4.351","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/5.4.351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

A program for quality assessment of medical diagnostics is proposed, based on detailed, ongoing comparison of clinical diagnoses with autopsy diagnoses. The model requires that the autopsy service itself be subjected to quality control to assure the reliability of the autopsy findings, including the quality of diagnoses made postmortem, and the quality of autopsy reports. Discrepancies between premortem and postmortem diagnoses are classified as to cause and magnitude; for each disease, the total diagnostic experience is collected, and sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnostics are computed. These are compared with control ranges of sensitivity and specificity, prospectively arrived at through analysis of thousands of cases. Statistically acceptable sampling for autopsy, and review of findings by an independent body are also discussed. The findings generated by this program would be of great value in programs for quality improvement of medical care. The model has the following advantages: (1) it recognises that there is an unavoidable baseline of diagnostic errors; (2) the control levels, based on current medical practice, are prospectively established; (3) it avoids placing blame in a single case; and (4) it provides a fairly high power scrutiny that can focus on diagnostics for single diseases rather than the entire spectrum of medical practice.

一个基于尸体解剖的质量评估程序,以提高诊断的准确性。
提出了一种基于临床诊断与尸检诊断的详细、持续比较的医学诊断质量评估方案。该模型要求尸检服务本身受到质量控制,以确保尸检结果的可靠性,包括死后诊断的质量和尸检报告的质量。死前和死后诊断之间的差异按原因和程度分类;对每一种疾病,收集总诊断经验,计算临床诊断的敏感性和特异性。通过对数千例病例的分析,将这些与敏感性和特异性的控制范围进行比较。还讨论了统计上可接受的尸检抽样,以及独立机构对调查结果的审查。该项目的研究结果将对提高医疗质量的项目有很大的价值。该模型具有以下优点:(1)它承认存在不可避免的诊断错误基线;(2)根据目前的医疗实践,前瞻性地建立控制水平;(三)避免单一责任;(4)它提供了相当高的权力审查,可以专注于单一疾病的诊断,而不是整个医疗实践的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信