Lumbar extradural morphine and caudal extradural morphine for postoperative analgesia and their adverse effects.

K P Chen, H C Chan, F S Chen, C H Wong, E C Chuah, P P Tan
{"title":"Lumbar extradural morphine and caudal extradural morphine for postoperative analgesia and their adverse effects.","authors":"K P Chen,&nbsp;H C Chan,&nbsp;F S Chen,&nbsp;C H Wong,&nbsp;E C Chuah,&nbsp;P P Tan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy of morphine by either lumbar extradural route or caudal extradural route and their adverse effects for postoperative analgesia were studied by comparing with the control group without morphine administration. 105 patients, 79 males and 26 females, aged 18 to 70 years, scheduled for hemorrhoidectomy surgery were selected. They were randomly assigned into three groups, i.e group I: without morphine use as control group (n = 35), group II: lumbar extradural morphine group (n = 35) and group III: caudal extradural morphine group (n = 35). Patients in group I received general anesthesia by face mask after induction by intravenous anesthetics and maintained with potent halogenated inhalation agents (isoflurane) through face mask. Patients in group II received lumbar extradural blockade through the L4-L5 intervertebral space, and those in group III received caudal extradural blockade through the sacrococcygeal junction (sacral hiatus) for intraoperative anesthesia and analgesia. Drugs included 0.5% bupivacaine 10ml + 2% xylocaine 10ml + 2mg morphine HCl + 0.1mg epinephrine were given either into the lumbar extradural space or into the caudal extradural space. No more narcotic has been given throughout the whole intraoperative course. All of these patients were followed up 24 hours later after the end of anesthesia. There were 11 patients (31.4%) in the control group, 26 patients (74.3%) in the lumbar extradural morphine group, and 25 patients (71.4%) in the caudal extradural morphine group who did not need additional narcotic for pain relief for more than 24 hours postoperatively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77247,"journal":{"name":"Ma zui xue za zhi = Anaesthesiologica Sinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ma zui xue za zhi = Anaesthesiologica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The efficacy of morphine by either lumbar extradural route or caudal extradural route and their adverse effects for postoperative analgesia were studied by comparing with the control group without morphine administration. 105 patients, 79 males and 26 females, aged 18 to 70 years, scheduled for hemorrhoidectomy surgery were selected. They were randomly assigned into three groups, i.e group I: without morphine use as control group (n = 35), group II: lumbar extradural morphine group (n = 35) and group III: caudal extradural morphine group (n = 35). Patients in group I received general anesthesia by face mask after induction by intravenous anesthetics and maintained with potent halogenated inhalation agents (isoflurane) through face mask. Patients in group II received lumbar extradural blockade through the L4-L5 intervertebral space, and those in group III received caudal extradural blockade through the sacrococcygeal junction (sacral hiatus) for intraoperative anesthesia and analgesia. Drugs included 0.5% bupivacaine 10ml + 2% xylocaine 10ml + 2mg morphine HCl + 0.1mg epinephrine were given either into the lumbar extradural space or into the caudal extradural space. No more narcotic has been given throughout the whole intraoperative course. All of these patients were followed up 24 hours later after the end of anesthesia. There were 11 patients (31.4%) in the control group, 26 patients (74.3%) in the lumbar extradural morphine group, and 25 patients (71.4%) in the caudal extradural morphine group who did not need additional narcotic for pain relief for more than 24 hours postoperatively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

腰椎硬膜外吗啡和尾侧硬膜外吗啡用于术后镇痛及其不良反应。
通过与未给予吗啡的对照组比较,研究吗啡经腰侧或尾侧硬膜外通路用于术后镇痛的疗效及不良反应。选取拟行痔疮切除术的患者105例,男79例,女26例,年龄18 ~ 70岁。随机分为3组:ⅰ组:不使用吗啡作为对照组(n = 35),ⅱ组:腰椎硬膜外吗啡组(n = 35),ⅲ组:尾侧硬膜外吗啡组(n = 35)。ⅰ组患者在静脉麻醉药诱导后采用面罩全麻,并通过面罩给予强效卤代吸入剂(异氟烷)维持。II组患者经L4-L5椎间隙行腰椎硬膜外阻滞,III组患者经骶尾骨交界处(骶裂孔)行尾侧硬膜外阻滞术中麻醉镇痛。药物为0.5%布比卡因10ml + 2%木卡因10ml +盐酸吗啡2mg +肾上腺素0.1mg,分别注入腰椎或尾侧硬膜外腔。在整个术中过程中均未使用麻醉药。所有患者在麻醉结束后24小时进行随访。对照组11例(31.4%),腰椎硬膜外吗啡组26例(74.3%),尾侧硬膜外吗啡组25例(71.4%)术后超过24小时不需要额外麻醉缓解疼痛。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信