[A comparative study on health promotion lifestyles between employed and unemployed women].

Kanhohak t'amgu Pub Date : 1994-01-01
Y O Suh
{"title":"[A comparative study on health promotion lifestyles between employed and unemployed women].","authors":"Y O Suh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This comparative survey research was conducted to compare the relationship between health promotion lifestyles, self-esteem, health locus of control and health perception for employed and unemployed women. The sample consisted of 58 employed women and 63 unemployed women residing in Seoul and over 35 years old. The tool used for this study was a structured questionnaire which was revised by the researcher. The tool consisted of 8 items related to demographic characteristics, 47 items on health promotion lifestyle profile, 10 items on self-esteem measurement, 18 items on health locus of control, 21 items on health perception questionnaire. The data collected from the interviews were analyzing using SPSS, yielding frequencies, percentiles, means, standard deviations, t-test, x2-test, Pearson's product moment correlation. The result of this study are as follows: 1) The demograpic variables for the two groups were homogenous except for age. 2) No significance differences were found between the two groups on the health promotion lifestyle (t = -.06, p = .954), but there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups on 2 subscale (self actualization and nutrition) of the health promotion lifestyle. Comparison of the order of the scores between the two groups for the employed women showed that the highest score was for nutrition, then self actualization, interpersonal support, stress management, health responsibility and exercise in that order. For the unemployed women, the highest score was for nutrition, then interpersonal support, self actualization, stress management, health responsibility and exercise in that order. 3) There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups on the self-esteem, employed women had lower score on self-esteem than unemployed women (t = -3.37, p = .001). 4) The result of the comparison between the two groups were significantly different for future health status, employed women (mean 3.57) had higher scores than unemployed women (mean 3.25) (t = 2.14, p = .034). 5) Comparison of the order of the scores between the two groups showed that the highest score was for internal health locus of control, but there was a statistically no significant difference. However, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups on the external health locus of control (t = -3.90, p = .000).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":79408,"journal":{"name":"Kanhohak t'amgu","volume":"3 1","pages":"93-113; discussion 114-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kanhohak t'amgu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This comparative survey research was conducted to compare the relationship between health promotion lifestyles, self-esteem, health locus of control and health perception for employed and unemployed women. The sample consisted of 58 employed women and 63 unemployed women residing in Seoul and over 35 years old. The tool used for this study was a structured questionnaire which was revised by the researcher. The tool consisted of 8 items related to demographic characteristics, 47 items on health promotion lifestyle profile, 10 items on self-esteem measurement, 18 items on health locus of control, 21 items on health perception questionnaire. The data collected from the interviews were analyzing using SPSS, yielding frequencies, percentiles, means, standard deviations, t-test, x2-test, Pearson's product moment correlation. The result of this study are as follows: 1) The demograpic variables for the two groups were homogenous except for age. 2) No significance differences were found between the two groups on the health promotion lifestyle (t = -.06, p = .954), but there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups on 2 subscale (self actualization and nutrition) of the health promotion lifestyle. Comparison of the order of the scores between the two groups for the employed women showed that the highest score was for nutrition, then self actualization, interpersonal support, stress management, health responsibility and exercise in that order. For the unemployed women, the highest score was for nutrition, then interpersonal support, self actualization, stress management, health responsibility and exercise in that order. 3) There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups on the self-esteem, employed women had lower score on self-esteem than unemployed women (t = -3.37, p = .001). 4) The result of the comparison between the two groups were significantly different for future health status, employed women (mean 3.57) had higher scores than unemployed women (mean 3.25) (t = 2.14, p = .034). 5) Comparison of the order of the scores between the two groups showed that the highest score was for internal health locus of control, but there was a statistically no significant difference. However, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups on the external health locus of control (t = -3.90, p = .000).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

[就业与失业妇女健康促进生活方式的比较研究]。
本研究旨在比较就业妇女与失业妇女健康促进生活方式、自尊、健康控制点和健康感知之间的关系。调查对象是居住在首尔的35岁以上的58名在职女性和63名失业女性。本研究使用的工具是由研究者修改的结构化问卷。该工具包括8个人口学特征问卷、47个健康促进生活方式问卷、10个自尊问卷、18个健康控制点问卷和21个健康感知问卷。从访谈中收集的数据使用SPSS进行分析,得出频率、百分位数、平均值、标准差、t检验、x2检验、Pearson积差相关性。本研究结果如下:1)两组人口统计学变量除年龄外均具有同质性。2)两组在健康促进生活方式上无显著差异(t = -)。(p = .954),但两组在健康促进生活方式的自我实现和营养两个分量表上差异有统计学意义。比较两组职业女性的得分顺序,得分最高的是营养,其次是自我实现、人际支持、压力管理、健康责任和锻炼。对于失业妇女来说,得分最高的是营养,其次是人际支持、自我实现、压力管理、健康责任和锻炼。3)两组自尊得分差异有统计学意义,就业妇女自尊得分低于失业妇女自尊得分(t = -3.37, p = .001)。4)两组对未来健康状况的比较结果有显著差异,在职女性(平均3.57分)高于失业女性(平均3.25分)(t = 2.14, p = 0.034)。5)比较两组间的得分顺序,内部健康控制点得分最高,但差异无统计学意义。然而,两组在外部健康控制点上差异有统计学意义(t = -3.90, p = .000)。(摘要删节为400字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信