Pseudomonas aureofaciens in soil: survival and recovery efficiency.

J S Angle, M A Levin, J V Gagliardi, M S McIntosh, J G Glew
{"title":"Pseudomonas aureofaciens in soil: survival and recovery efficiency.","authors":"J S Angle,&nbsp;M A Levin,&nbsp;J V Gagliardi,&nbsp;M S McIntosh,&nbsp;J G Glew","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Efficient methods for the recovery of genetically engineered organisms (GEM) added to soil are critical if the safety of potential releases is to be evaluated and the actual release is to be monitored. Pseudomonas aureofaciens strain 3732 RN-L11 (lacZY) was added to 10 g sieved soil microcosms and incubated for 5 and 28 days. Various diluents, shaking methods, and settling of soil were examined to determine the optimum method for recovery of the GEM from the soil. Of the diluents examined, 0.1% agar gave significantly lower numbers than distilled water, 1.0% sodium metaphosphate, 1% peptone, and phosphate-buffered water. After 5 days of incubation, shaking for 10 min with glass beads and shaking for 30 min without glass beads resulted in the highest recovery of the GEM from soil, while sonification resulted in the lowest recovery. After 28 days of incubation, sonification produced significantly lower numbers than any of the other treatments. The addition of 1% CaCl2 to enhance settling significantly increased recovery efficiency. Although the use of CaCl2 in distilled water and shaking for 10 min was an effective method for recovering P. aureofaciens from a Maryland soil, when the same extraction procedure was compared with a standard technique (dd H2O, shaking for 10 min) for eight divergent soils, neither extraction method was consistently better than the other. Statistical analysis of the data showed the need for log transformation of the raw data. Four microcosm and two plate replicates for each dilution provided the greatest ability to detect differences between treatment means while maximizing experimental efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":77262,"journal":{"name":"Microbial releases : viruses, bacteria, fungi","volume":"2 4","pages":"247-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial releases : viruses, bacteria, fungi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Efficient methods for the recovery of genetically engineered organisms (GEM) added to soil are critical if the safety of potential releases is to be evaluated and the actual release is to be monitored. Pseudomonas aureofaciens strain 3732 RN-L11 (lacZY) was added to 10 g sieved soil microcosms and incubated for 5 and 28 days. Various diluents, shaking methods, and settling of soil were examined to determine the optimum method for recovery of the GEM from the soil. Of the diluents examined, 0.1% agar gave significantly lower numbers than distilled water, 1.0% sodium metaphosphate, 1% peptone, and phosphate-buffered water. After 5 days of incubation, shaking for 10 min with glass beads and shaking for 30 min without glass beads resulted in the highest recovery of the GEM from soil, while sonification resulted in the lowest recovery. After 28 days of incubation, sonification produced significantly lower numbers than any of the other treatments. The addition of 1% CaCl2 to enhance settling significantly increased recovery efficiency. Although the use of CaCl2 in distilled water and shaking for 10 min was an effective method for recovering P. aureofaciens from a Maryland soil, when the same extraction procedure was compared with a standard technique (dd H2O, shaking for 10 min) for eight divergent soils, neither extraction method was consistently better than the other. Statistical analysis of the data showed the need for log transformation of the raw data. Four microcosm and two plate replicates for each dilution provided the greatest ability to detect differences between treatment means while maximizing experimental efficiency.

金黄色假单胞菌在土壤中的生存和恢复效率。
如果要评估潜在释放的安全性并监测实际释放,那么有效地回收添加到土壤中的基因工程生物(GEM)的方法至关重要。将金黄色假单胞菌3732 RN-L11 (lacZY)加入10 g筛选过的土壤培养皿中,孵育5 d和28 d。研究了各种稀释剂、震动法和土壤沉降法,以确定从土壤中回收GEM的最佳方法。在所检测的稀释剂中,0.1%琼脂的数量明显低于蒸馏水、1.0%偏磷酸钠、1%蛋白胨和磷酸盐缓冲水。培养5 d后,有玻璃珠振动10 min和无玻璃珠振动30 min,土壤中GEM的回收率最高,超声处理的回收率最低。经过28天的孵育,超声处理产生的数量明显低于任何其他处理。加入1%的CaCl2增强沉淀,可显著提高回收率。虽然在蒸馏水中使用CaCl2并摇晃10分钟是从马里兰州土壤中回收金黄色葡萄球菌的有效方法,但当将相同的提取程序与标准技术(添加H2O,摇晃10分钟)进行比较时,两种提取方法都不一致优于另一种。对数据进行统计分析表明,需要对原始数据进行对数变换。每种稀释度的4个显微镜和2个平板重复提供了最大的能力来检测处理方式之间的差异,同时最大限度地提高了实验效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信