[Evaluation of physical exercise and fatigue sensation by CFSI (Cumulative Fatigue Symptoms Index)].

E Mizuno, S Amano, T Homma, Y Mano
{"title":"[Evaluation of physical exercise and fatigue sensation by CFSI (Cumulative Fatigue Symptoms Index)].","authors":"E Mizuno,&nbsp;S Amano,&nbsp;T Homma,&nbsp;Y Mano","doi":"10.2114/ahs1983.13.403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cumulative Fatigue Symptoms Index (CFSI) is used for workers' subjective assessment of feeling of fatigue and of symptoms. Until now, this index has been used in the analysis of members of the same occupation. The purpose of this study is to examine fatigue symptoms in workers and to assess by CFSI the effect of regular physical exercise. Study participants were an exercise group (n = 67) and a non-exercise group (n = 115) of older workers, aged from 30 to 69 years. The CFSI questionnaire was distributed to all participants and the former group (exercise) answered two descriptive questions concerning the aim and subjective effects of physical exercise. As a result, it was found that mental fatigue symptoms decreased in the exercise group even after considering the differences in managerial position, subjective senses on health and marital status which are related to degree of feelings of fatigue. Weakened vitality was significantly less in the exercise group than the non-exercise group. Therefore, we concluded that weakened vitality would be needed to be regarded on an assessment scale for effects caused by exercise. It has also been considered that we should investigate general fatigue in assessing physical fatigue relating to one's lifestyle.</p>","PeriodicalId":77409,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of physiological anthropology = Seiri Jinruigaku Kenkyukai kaishi","volume":"13 6","pages":"403-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2114/ahs1983.13.403","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of physiological anthropology = Seiri Jinruigaku Kenkyukai kaishi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2114/ahs1983.13.403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cumulative Fatigue Symptoms Index (CFSI) is used for workers' subjective assessment of feeling of fatigue and of symptoms. Until now, this index has been used in the analysis of members of the same occupation. The purpose of this study is to examine fatigue symptoms in workers and to assess by CFSI the effect of regular physical exercise. Study participants were an exercise group (n = 67) and a non-exercise group (n = 115) of older workers, aged from 30 to 69 years. The CFSI questionnaire was distributed to all participants and the former group (exercise) answered two descriptive questions concerning the aim and subjective effects of physical exercise. As a result, it was found that mental fatigue symptoms decreased in the exercise group even after considering the differences in managerial position, subjective senses on health and marital status which are related to degree of feelings of fatigue. Weakened vitality was significantly less in the exercise group than the non-exercise group. Therefore, we concluded that weakened vitality would be needed to be regarded on an assessment scale for effects caused by exercise. It has also been considered that we should investigate general fatigue in assessing physical fatigue relating to one's lifestyle.

[用累积疲劳症状指数(CFSI)评价体育锻炼和疲劳感觉]。
累积疲劳症状指数(CFSI)是工人对疲劳感觉和症状的主观评价。到目前为止,该指数一直用于分析同一职业的成员。本研究的目的是研究工人的疲劳症状,并通过CFSI评估定期体育锻炼的效果。研究参与者是一组运动组(n = 67)和一组不运动组(n = 115),年龄在30岁至69岁之间。CFSI问卷被分发给所有参与者,前一组(运动)回答了两个关于体育锻炼的目的和主观效果的描述性问题。结果发现,即使考虑到与疲劳感程度相关的管理职位、主观健康感觉和婚姻状况的差异,运动组的精神疲劳症状也有所减轻。运动组活力减弱的情况明显少于不运动组。因此,我们得出结论,需要将活力减弱纳入运动影响的评估量表。也有人认为,在评估与生活方式有关的身体疲劳时,我们应该调查一般疲劳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书