Silicone breast implant rupture: common/serious complication?

Medical progress through technology Pub Date : 1994-01-01
C M Malata, S Varma, M Scott, J C Liston, D T Sharpe
{"title":"Silicone breast implant rupture: common/serious complication?","authors":"C M Malata,&nbsp;S Varma,&nbsp;M Scott,&nbsp;J C Liston,&nbsp;D T Sharpe","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Of the potential health risks of silicone breast implants it is the concern about implant durability, life span and the possible association with connective tissue disease which has attracted most attention. A prospective study addressing these factors was therefore undertaken over an 11 month period. 51 patients presenting with significant capsular contracture, suspected prosthesis rupture or unrelieved implant-induced anxiety underwent revisional breast surgery after biochemical, haematological and immunological screening. Of these 51 patients (83 breasts), 14 (19 breasts) had ruptured implants (23% incidence). These were all smooth prostheses belonging to a cohort manufactured more than 10 years ago; their mean in situ duration being 12 years vs. 5.5 years for the intact group (p = 0.0024; Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA). There were no systemic complications from implant rupture and the mean blood silicon level was normal. One patient with pre-existing pernicious anaemia had elevated autoantibodies. The mean ESR in the ruptured implant group was 6 mm/hour. It is concluded that rupture of breast implants is not as uncommon as hitherto thought and is strongly correlated with their in situ duration. In this study implant gel leakage was not associated with serious systemic effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":76136,"journal":{"name":"Medical progress through technology","volume":"20 3-4","pages":"251-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical progress through technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Of the potential health risks of silicone breast implants it is the concern about implant durability, life span and the possible association with connective tissue disease which has attracted most attention. A prospective study addressing these factors was therefore undertaken over an 11 month period. 51 patients presenting with significant capsular contracture, suspected prosthesis rupture or unrelieved implant-induced anxiety underwent revisional breast surgery after biochemical, haematological and immunological screening. Of these 51 patients (83 breasts), 14 (19 breasts) had ruptured implants (23% incidence). These were all smooth prostheses belonging to a cohort manufactured more than 10 years ago; their mean in situ duration being 12 years vs. 5.5 years for the intact group (p = 0.0024; Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA). There were no systemic complications from implant rupture and the mean blood silicon level was normal. One patient with pre-existing pernicious anaemia had elevated autoantibodies. The mean ESR in the ruptured implant group was 6 mm/hour. It is concluded that rupture of breast implants is not as uncommon as hitherto thought and is strongly correlated with their in situ duration. In this study implant gel leakage was not associated with serious systemic effects.

硅胶假体破裂:常见/严重并发症?
在硅胶乳房植入物的潜在健康风险中,人们最关注的是植入物的耐用性、使用寿命以及与结缔组织疾病的可能关联。因此,对这些因素进行了为期11个月的前瞻性研究。51例患者经生化、血液学和免疫学筛查后,因假体明显挛缩、假体疑似破裂或假体引起的焦虑未得到缓解而行乳房翻修手术。51例患者(83个乳房)中,14例(19个乳房)假体破裂(23%)。这些都是十多年前制造的光滑假体;他们的平均原位持续时间为12年,而完整组为5.5年(p = 0.0024;Kruskal-Wallis单因素方差分析)。无种植体破裂引起的全身并发症,平均血硅水平正常。一名既往存在恶性贫血的患者自身抗体升高。种植体破裂组平均ESR为6mm /h。结论是,乳房植入物破裂并不像以前认为的那样罕见,并且与植入物在原位的持续时间密切相关。在这项研究中,植入物凝胶渗漏与严重的全身效应无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书