Clinical and treatment correlates of access to Section 8 certificates for homeless mentally ill persons.

L Dixon, N Krauss, P Myers, A Lehman
{"title":"Clinical and treatment correlates of access to Section 8 certificates for homeless mentally ill persons.","authors":"L Dixon,&nbsp;N Krauss,&nbsp;P Myers,&nbsp;A Lehman","doi":"10.1176/ps.45.12.1196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study assessed how clients' housing preference and other variables were related to the acquisition of Section 8 certificates, facilitating independent living, for homeless persons with severe mental illness who were being served by an experimental assertive community treatment team.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For 77 clients, demographic and clinical differences between receivers and nonreceivers of certificates were examined, and correlates of time from referral to the team to completion of the Section 8 application were analyzed. Reasons clients did not receive certificates and housing outcomes were summarized in relation to client preference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 34 clients who received certificates (44 percent) had significantly less psychopathology after three months than did nonreceivers and tended to have affective disorders rather than schizophrenia. Of the 43 nonreceivers, the two largest groups were 19 clients who did not want certificates and ten clients who wanted certificates but whom staff considered unable to live safely in an unsupervised apartment. The mean +/- SD length of time for application for a certificate was 5.7 +/- 5.8 months. Longer time to apply was significantly associated with having schizophrenia, having the team as a representative payee, and showing increased psychotic symptoms at referral and at three months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study suggests that it is possible to honor the housing preferences of the majority of homeless persons with severe mental illness if adequate resources are provided. However, staff may view persons who have schizophrenia and more symptoms as needing more supervision than those clients prefer. Homeless mentally ill persons may also take longer than more symptomatic persons to pursue independent living through a Section 8 certificate.</p>","PeriodicalId":75910,"journal":{"name":"Hospital & community psychiatry","volume":"45 12","pages":"1196-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1176/ps.45.12.1196","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital & community psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.45.12.1196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Objective: The study assessed how clients' housing preference and other variables were related to the acquisition of Section 8 certificates, facilitating independent living, for homeless persons with severe mental illness who were being served by an experimental assertive community treatment team.

Methods: For 77 clients, demographic and clinical differences between receivers and nonreceivers of certificates were examined, and correlates of time from referral to the team to completion of the Section 8 application were analyzed. Reasons clients did not receive certificates and housing outcomes were summarized in relation to client preference.

Results: The 34 clients who received certificates (44 percent) had significantly less psychopathology after three months than did nonreceivers and tended to have affective disorders rather than schizophrenia. Of the 43 nonreceivers, the two largest groups were 19 clients who did not want certificates and ten clients who wanted certificates but whom staff considered unable to live safely in an unsupervised apartment. The mean +/- SD length of time for application for a certificate was 5.7 +/- 5.8 months. Longer time to apply was significantly associated with having schizophrenia, having the team as a representative payee, and showing increased psychotic symptoms at referral and at three months.

Conclusions: The study suggests that it is possible to honor the housing preferences of the majority of homeless persons with severe mental illness if adequate resources are provided. However, staff may view persons who have schizophrenia and more symptoms as needing more supervision than those clients prefer. Homeless mentally ill persons may also take longer than more symptomatic persons to pursue independent living through a Section 8 certificate.

无家可归的精神病患者获得第8节证书的临床和治疗相关因素。
目的:本研究评估了由实验性自信社区治疗团队服务的患有严重精神疾病的无家可归者的住房偏好和其他变量与获得第8节证书、促进独立生活的关系。方法:对77名患者进行了人口统计学和临床差异的检查,并分析了从转诊到团队完成第8节申请的相关时间。客户没有收到证书和住房结果的原因与客户偏好有关。结果:34名获得证书的患者(44%)在三个月后的精神病理明显少于未获得证书的患者,并且倾向于情感障碍而不是精神分裂症。在43名未获得证书的客户中,两个最大的群体是19名客户,他们不想要证书,10名客户想要证书,但工作人员认为他们无法在无人监管的公寓中安全居住。申请证书的平均+/- SD时间为5.7 +/- 5.8个月。较长的申请时间与患有精神分裂症、以团队为代表的受款人以及在转诊和三个月时表现出增加的精神病症状显著相关。结论:研究表明,如果提供足够的资源,尊重大多数患有严重精神疾病的无家可归者的住房偏好是可能的。然而,工作人员可能认为患有精神分裂症和更多症状的人需要更多的监督,而不是客户所希望的。无家可归的精神病患者也可能比其他有症状的人需要更长的时间才能通过第8条的证明寻求独立生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信