Spatiotemporal pattern of quantal release of ATP and noradrenaline from sympathetic nerves: consequences for neuromuscular transmission.

L Stjärne, P Astrand, J X Bao, F Gonon, M Msghina, E Stjärne
{"title":"Spatiotemporal pattern of quantal release of ATP and noradrenaline from sympathetic nerves: consequences for neuromuscular transmission.","authors":"L Stjärne,&nbsp;P Astrand,&nbsp;J X Bao,&nbsp;F Gonon,&nbsp;M Msghina,&nbsp;E Stjärne","doi":"10.1016/s1040-7952(06)80030-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recent explosive development in research concerning the fundamental mechanisms of synaptic transmission helps put the present paper in context. It is now evident that not all transmitter vesicles in a nerve terminal, not even all those docked at its active zones, are immediately available for release (36). We watch, fascinated, the unraveling of the amazingly complex cellular mechanisms and molecular machinery that determine whether or not a vesicle is \"exocytosis-competent\" (77,78,39,79). Studies on quantal release in different systems show that neurons are fundamentally similar in one respect: that transmitter release from individual active zones is monoquantal (2). But they also show that active zones in different neurons differ drastically in the probability of monoquantal release and in the number of quanta immediately available for release (3). This implies that one should not extrapolate directly from transmitter release in one set of presynaptic terminals (e.g., in neuromuscular endplate or squid giant synapse) to that in other nerve terminals, especially if they have a very different morphology. As shown here, one should not even extrapolate from transmitter release in sympathetic nerves in one tissue (e.g., rat tail artery) to that in other tissues or species (e.g., mouse vas deferens). It is noteworthy that most studies of quantal release are based on electrophysiological analysis and therefore deal with release of fast, ionotropic transmitters from small synaptic vesicles at the active zones, especially in neurons in which these events may be examined with high resolution (49,48,46,33,32). Such data are useful as general models of the release of both fast and slow transmitters from small synaptic vesicles at active zones in other systems, provided that these transmitters are released in parallel, as are apparently ATP and NA in sympathetic nerves. They tell us little or nothing, however, about the release of transmitters (e.g., neuropeptides) from the large vesicles, nor about the spatiotemporal pattern of monoquantal release from small synaptic vesicles in the many neurons that have boutons-en-passent terminals. They show that the time course of effector responses to fast, rapidly inactivated transmitters such as ACh or ATP is necessarily release related. But they do not even address the possibility that the effector responses to slow transmitters such as NA, co-released from the same terminals, may obey completely different rules and perhaps rather be clearance related (7).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":76981,"journal":{"name":"Advances in second messenger and phosphoprotein research","volume":"29 ","pages":"461-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in second messenger and phosphoprotein research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1040-7952(06)80030-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

The recent explosive development in research concerning the fundamental mechanisms of synaptic transmission helps put the present paper in context. It is now evident that not all transmitter vesicles in a nerve terminal, not even all those docked at its active zones, are immediately available for release (36). We watch, fascinated, the unraveling of the amazingly complex cellular mechanisms and molecular machinery that determine whether or not a vesicle is "exocytosis-competent" (77,78,39,79). Studies on quantal release in different systems show that neurons are fundamentally similar in one respect: that transmitter release from individual active zones is monoquantal (2). But they also show that active zones in different neurons differ drastically in the probability of monoquantal release and in the number of quanta immediately available for release (3). This implies that one should not extrapolate directly from transmitter release in one set of presynaptic terminals (e.g., in neuromuscular endplate or squid giant synapse) to that in other nerve terminals, especially if they have a very different morphology. As shown here, one should not even extrapolate from transmitter release in sympathetic nerves in one tissue (e.g., rat tail artery) to that in other tissues or species (e.g., mouse vas deferens). It is noteworthy that most studies of quantal release are based on electrophysiological analysis and therefore deal with release of fast, ionotropic transmitters from small synaptic vesicles at the active zones, especially in neurons in which these events may be examined with high resolution (49,48,46,33,32). Such data are useful as general models of the release of both fast and slow transmitters from small synaptic vesicles at active zones in other systems, provided that these transmitters are released in parallel, as are apparently ATP and NA in sympathetic nerves. They tell us little or nothing, however, about the release of transmitters (e.g., neuropeptides) from the large vesicles, nor about the spatiotemporal pattern of monoquantal release from small synaptic vesicles in the many neurons that have boutons-en-passent terminals. They show that the time course of effector responses to fast, rapidly inactivated transmitters such as ACh or ATP is necessarily release related. But they do not even address the possibility that the effector responses to slow transmitters such as NA, co-released from the same terminals, may obey completely different rules and perhaps rather be clearance related (7).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

交感神经量释放ATP和去甲肾上腺素的时空模式:神经肌肉传递的后果。
最近关于突触传递基本机制的研究取得了爆炸性的发展,这有助于将本文置于背景中。现在很明显,不是神经末梢的所有递质囊泡,甚至不是所有停靠在其活跃区的递质囊泡,都能立即释放(36)。我们看着,着迷,揭示了令人惊讶的复杂细胞机制和分子机制,这些机制和分子机制决定了一个囊泡是否具有“胞吐能力”(77,78,39,79)。对不同系统中量子释放的研究表明,神经元在一个方面是基本相似的:从单个活跃区的递质释放是单量子的(2)。但他们也表明,不同神经元的活跃区在单量子释放的概率和立即可释放的量子数量上存在巨大差异(3)。这意味着人们不应该直接从一组突触前末端(例如,在神经肌肉终板或鱿鱼巨突触中)的递质释放推断出其他神经末端的递质释放。尤其是当它们的形态非常不同的时候。如图所示,我们甚至不应该从一个组织(如大鼠尾动脉)交感神经中的递质释放推断到其他组织或物种(如小鼠输精管)中的递质释放。值得注意的是,大多数关于量子释放的研究都是基于电生理分析,因此处理的是活跃区小突触囊泡快速释放的离子性递质,特别是在神经元中,这些事件可以用高分辨率进行检测(49,48,46,33,32)。如果这些递质是平行释放的,如交感神经中的ATP和NA,那么这些数据对于其他系统中活跃区的小突触囊泡释放快慢递质的一般模型是有用的。然而,对于从大囊泡中释放递质(如神经肽)的情况,它们几乎或根本没有告诉我们,也没有告诉我们许多具有钮扣传递终端的神经元中小突触囊泡单量释放的时空模式。结果表明,效应体对快速灭活的递质(如ACh或ATP)反应的时间过程必然与释放有关。但他们甚至没有考虑到效应器对慢速递质(如NA)的响应可能遵循完全不同的规则,甚至可能与间隙相关(7)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信