A national survey of jail diversion programs for mentally ill detainees.

H J Steadman, S S Barbera, D L Dennis
{"title":"A national survey of jail diversion programs for mentally ill detainees.","authors":"H J Steadman,&nbsp;S S Barbera,&nbsp;D L Dennis","doi":"10.1176/ps.45.11.1109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors sought information on the number, structure, and effectiveness of programs aimed at diverting mentally ill inmates from the criminal justice system into the mental health treatment system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A working definition of a jail diversion program was developed. Mail surveys were distributed to 1,263 U.S. jails with a capacity of 50 or more detainees to ascertain the presence or absence of diversion programs. Telephone interviews with samples of respondents and nonrespondents to the mail survey yielded additional information about the programs' operation, funding, staffing, and directors' perceptions of their effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Information obtained from the mail and telephone surveys indicated that only 52 U.S. jails with a capacity of 50 or more detainees had formal mental health diversion programs that fit the definition developed by the authors. Programs in larger jails served fewer violent felons than did those in smaller jails. Three-fourths of the programs were located in mental health agencies. Two-thirds of program directors considered the programs to be moderately or very effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only a small number of U.S. jails have diversion programs for mentally ill detainees, and objective data on their effectiveness are lacking. Systematic evaluations are needed to determine what types of programs work best for which types of detainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":75910,"journal":{"name":"Hospital & community psychiatry","volume":"45 11","pages":"1109-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1176/ps.45.11.1109","citationCount":"104","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital & community psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.45.11.1109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 104

Abstract

Objectives: The authors sought information on the number, structure, and effectiveness of programs aimed at diverting mentally ill inmates from the criminal justice system into the mental health treatment system.

Methods: A working definition of a jail diversion program was developed. Mail surveys were distributed to 1,263 U.S. jails with a capacity of 50 or more detainees to ascertain the presence or absence of diversion programs. Telephone interviews with samples of respondents and nonrespondents to the mail survey yielded additional information about the programs' operation, funding, staffing, and directors' perceptions of their effectiveness.

Results: Information obtained from the mail and telephone surveys indicated that only 52 U.S. jails with a capacity of 50 or more detainees had formal mental health diversion programs that fit the definition developed by the authors. Programs in larger jails served fewer violent felons than did those in smaller jails. Three-fourths of the programs were located in mental health agencies. Two-thirds of program directors considered the programs to be moderately or very effective.

Conclusions: Only a small number of U.S. jails have diversion programs for mentally ill detainees, and objective data on their effectiveness are lacking. Systematic evaluations are needed to determine what types of programs work best for which types of detainees.

一项针对精神疾病在押人员的监狱转移计划的全国性调查。
目的:作者寻求有关旨在将刑事司法系统中的精神病囚犯转移到精神健康治疗系统的方案的数量、结构和有效性的信息。方法:对监狱分流方案进行了工作定义。向1263所可容纳50名或更多在押人员的美国监狱分发了邮件调查,以确定是否存在转移项目。对邮件调查的回答者和非回答者样本进行电话采访,获得了有关项目运作、资金、人员配备和主管对其有效性的看法的额外信息。结果:从邮件和电话调查中获得的信息表明,只有52所能容纳50名或更多被拘留者的美国监狱有符合作者定义的正式的心理健康转移项目。大型监狱的项目比小型监狱的项目服务的暴力重罪犯更少。四分之三的项目位于心理健康机构。三分之二的项目主管认为这些项目是中等或非常有效的。结论:只有少数美国监狱有精神疾病囚犯的分流项目,而且缺乏关于其有效性的客观数据。需要进行系统的评估,以确定哪种类型的项目对哪种类型的被拘留者最有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信