Defining managed care in public-sector psychiatry.

M A Hoge, L Davidson, E E Griffith, W H Sledge, R A Howenstine
{"title":"Defining managed care in public-sector psychiatry.","authors":"M A Hoge,&nbsp;L Davidson,&nbsp;E E Griffith,&nbsp;W H Sledge,&nbsp;R A Howenstine","doi":"10.1176/ps.45.11.1085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although managed care is an established force in the private sector, there is growing interest and experimentation with this concept in the public sector. This interest has been generated by the increased demand for services, the shrinking resource base due to cutbacks in state budgets, and the fragmentation of care that has accompanied the shift from a centralized, hospital-based model to a decentralized, community-based model for treating individuals with serious mental illness. But despite this interest, no consensus exists about the form or functions of managed care in the public arena. Simply importing private-sector versions of managed care is inadequate given the substantial differences in the patient population and service delivery mechanisms. The authors present a functional analysis of managed care in the public sector. Drawing on their conceptualization of managed care, they outline a functional approach to evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of treatment systems, innovations such as privatization and capitation, and recent health care reform proposals.</p>","PeriodicalId":75910,"journal":{"name":"Hospital & community psychiatry","volume":"45 11","pages":"1085-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1176/ps.45.11.1085","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital & community psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.45.11.1085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

Although managed care is an established force in the private sector, there is growing interest and experimentation with this concept in the public sector. This interest has been generated by the increased demand for services, the shrinking resource base due to cutbacks in state budgets, and the fragmentation of care that has accompanied the shift from a centralized, hospital-based model to a decentralized, community-based model for treating individuals with serious mental illness. But despite this interest, no consensus exists about the form or functions of managed care in the public arena. Simply importing private-sector versions of managed care is inadequate given the substantial differences in the patient population and service delivery mechanisms. The authors present a functional analysis of managed care in the public sector. Drawing on their conceptualization of managed care, they outline a functional approach to evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of treatment systems, innovations such as privatization and capitation, and recent health care reform proposals.

定义公共部门精神病学的管理式医疗。
尽管管理式医疗在私营部门已成为一种既定的力量,但在公共部门,对这一概念的兴趣和实验也在不断增加。产生这种兴趣的原因是,对服务的需求增加,国家预算削减导致资源基础萎缩,以及治疗严重精神疾病患者的模式从以医院为基础的集中模式向以社区为基础的分散模式转变所带来的护理分散。但是,尽管有这种兴趣,在公共领域,关于管理式医疗的形式或功能还没有达成共识。考虑到患者群体和服务提供机制的巨大差异,仅仅引进私营部门版本的管理式医疗是不够的。作者提出了在公共部门管理护理的功能分析。根据他们对管理式医疗的概念,他们概述了一种功能性方法来评估治疗系统的优缺点、私有化和人头化等创新以及最近的医疗改革建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信