Duplex scanning for grading aortoiliac obstructive disease and guiding treatment

A.A.E.A. de Smet, K. Visser, P.J.E.H.M. Kitslaar
{"title":"Duplex scanning for grading aortoiliac obstructive disease and guiding treatment","authors":"A.A.E.A. de Smet,&nbsp;K. Visser,&nbsp;P.J.E.H.M. Kitslaar","doi":"10.1016/S0950-821X(05)80651-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Standard assessment of aortoiliac obstructive disease (AIOD) includes arteriography preferably supplemented with femoral artery pressure (FAP) measurements. This study investigated the value of Duplex scanning in classifying AIOD and compared the outcome of Duplex scanning with clinical decision making. One-hundred-and-fifty-three aortoiliac segments of 87 patients were prospectively examined by Duplex scanning, arteriography, and FAP measurements to establish the presence or absence of significant AIOD. The results of these tests were compared to each other and to the subsequent vascular interventions and their success rates. Excellent agreement (kappa 0.82) was found between Duplex scanning and arteriography. The agreement between Duplex scanning and FAP measurements was much lower (kappa 0.52). The correlation between the performed treatment and the assessment of AIOD by Duplex scanning or arteriography was good, whereas the FAP results correlated only moderately with the performed treatment. Endovascular or operative treatment was actually performed in only 63% of the aortoiliac segments with an abnormal FAP test (success rate 80%). Aortoiliac segments with significant AIOD according to arteriography or Duplex scanning were treated invasively in 86% (success rate 81%) and 82% (success rate 80%), respectively. In conclusion, Duplex scanning can replace arteriography as a screening tool for the identification of treatable aortoiliac lesions whereas the value of FAP measurements in the decision making process is limited.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77123,"journal":{"name":"European journal of vascular surgery","volume":"8 6","pages":"Pages 711-715"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-821X(05)80651-6","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950821X05806516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Standard assessment of aortoiliac obstructive disease (AIOD) includes arteriography preferably supplemented with femoral artery pressure (FAP) measurements. This study investigated the value of Duplex scanning in classifying AIOD and compared the outcome of Duplex scanning with clinical decision making. One-hundred-and-fifty-three aortoiliac segments of 87 patients were prospectively examined by Duplex scanning, arteriography, and FAP measurements to establish the presence or absence of significant AIOD. The results of these tests were compared to each other and to the subsequent vascular interventions and their success rates. Excellent agreement (kappa 0.82) was found between Duplex scanning and arteriography. The agreement between Duplex scanning and FAP measurements was much lower (kappa 0.52). The correlation between the performed treatment and the assessment of AIOD by Duplex scanning or arteriography was good, whereas the FAP results correlated only moderately with the performed treatment. Endovascular or operative treatment was actually performed in only 63% of the aortoiliac segments with an abnormal FAP test (success rate 80%). Aortoiliac segments with significant AIOD according to arteriography or Duplex scanning were treated invasively in 86% (success rate 81%) and 82% (success rate 80%), respectively. In conclusion, Duplex scanning can replace arteriography as a screening tool for the identification of treatable aortoiliac lesions whereas the value of FAP measurements in the decision making process is limited.

双相扫描对主动脉-髂梗阻性疾病的分级及指导治疗
主动脉髂阻塞性疾病(AIOD)的标准评估包括动脉造影,最好辅以股动脉压(FAP)测量。本研究探讨双相扫描在AIOD分类中的价值,并将双相扫描结果与临床决策结果进行比较。通过双工扫描、动脉造影和FAP测量对87例患者的153个主动脉髂段进行前瞻性检查,以确定是否存在明显的AIOD。这些测试的结果相互比较,并与随后的血管干预及其成功率进行比较。双工扫描与动脉造影结果吻合良好(kappa 0.82)。双工扫描与FAP测量的一致性要低得多(kappa 0.52)。所进行的治疗与双工扫描或动脉造影评估AIOD之间的相关性良好,而FAP结果与所进行的治疗仅中度相关。实际上,只有63%的FAP检测异常的主动脉髂段接受了血管内或手术治疗(成功率为80%)。动脉造影或双工扫描显示明显AIOD的主动脉髂段,分别有创治疗86%(成功率81%)和82%(成功率80%)。总之,双工扫描可以取代动脉造影作为鉴别可治疗的髂主动脉病变的筛查工具,而FAP测量在决策过程中的价值是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信