[Cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes].

Diabete & metabolisme Pub Date : 1994-11-01
B Lesobre
{"title":"[Cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes].","authors":"B Lesobre","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Morbidity and mortality through coronary atherosclerosis are higher in Type 2 diabetic patients than in nondiabetic subjects, roughly by a factor of 2 in males and 3 in females. Methodological problems in attempting to weigh the relative effects of each factor make it difficult to accurately interpret the numerous epidemiological data already available. Three issues are discussed here:--Do diabetics have more \"classic\" risk factors than nondiabetics? The incidence of hypertension, lipid disorders, and even smoking is practically consistently higher in diabetics, with \"diabetic\" lipid disorders (decreased HDL cholesterol and hypertriglyceridemia) topping the list.--Do diabetics have specific risk factors which could explain the observed increase in coronary morbidity and mortality? The answer would appear to be yes, as patent microalbuminuria--between 30 and 300 mg/24 hours--is found, as well as retinopathy and an increase in fibrinogen and PAI1 plasminogen activator inhibitor. Recent genetic studies have highlighted the role of Lp (a), and particularly that of angiotensin converting-enzyme gene polymorphism (DD allele).--What are the respective roles of hyperglycalmia and elevated levels of circulating insulin? In contrast to the importance of insulin in nondiabetics as demonstrated in longitudinal studies, insulin appears to play a marginal or even nil role in diabetics once the disease is established. It is probably glycaemia itself which remains the fundamental factor, even though the mechanisms leading from hyperglycemia to macrovascular complications remain unknown.</p>","PeriodicalId":11111,"journal":{"name":"Diabete & metabolisme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabete & metabolisme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Morbidity and mortality through coronary atherosclerosis are higher in Type 2 diabetic patients than in nondiabetic subjects, roughly by a factor of 2 in males and 3 in females. Methodological problems in attempting to weigh the relative effects of each factor make it difficult to accurately interpret the numerous epidemiological data already available. Three issues are discussed here:--Do diabetics have more "classic" risk factors than nondiabetics? The incidence of hypertension, lipid disorders, and even smoking is practically consistently higher in diabetics, with "diabetic" lipid disorders (decreased HDL cholesterol and hypertriglyceridemia) topping the list.--Do diabetics have specific risk factors which could explain the observed increase in coronary morbidity and mortality? The answer would appear to be yes, as patent microalbuminuria--between 30 and 300 mg/24 hours--is found, as well as retinopathy and an increase in fibrinogen and PAI1 plasminogen activator inhibitor. Recent genetic studies have highlighted the role of Lp (a), and particularly that of angiotensin converting-enzyme gene polymorphism (DD allele).--What are the respective roles of hyperglycalmia and elevated levels of circulating insulin? In contrast to the importance of insulin in nondiabetics as demonstrated in longitudinal studies, insulin appears to play a marginal or even nil role in diabetics once the disease is established. It is probably glycaemia itself which remains the fundamental factor, even though the mechanisms leading from hyperglycemia to macrovascular complications remain unknown.

2型糖尿病的心血管危险因素。
2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉粥样硬化的发病率和死亡率高于非糖尿病患者,男性约为2倍,女性约为3倍。在试图衡量每个因素的相对影响时,存在方法上的问题,因此难以准确解释已有的大量流行病学数据。这里讨论了三个问题:—糖尿病患者是否比非糖尿病患者有更多的“经典”危险因素?高血压、脂质紊乱、甚至吸烟在糖尿病患者中的发病率实际上一直较高,其中“糖尿病”脂质紊乱(高密度脂蛋白胆固醇降低和高甘油三酯血症)高居榜首。糖尿病患者是否有特定的危险因素可以解释观察到的冠状动脉发病率和死亡率的增加?答案似乎是肯定的,因为在30至300毫克/24小时之间发现了专利微量白蛋白尿,以及视网膜病变和纤维蛋白原和PAI1纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂的增加。最近的遗传学研究强调了Lp (a)的作用,特别是血管紧张素转换酶基因多态性(DD等位基因)。高血糖和循环胰岛素水平升高各自的作用是什么?与纵向研究证明的胰岛素在非糖尿病患者中的重要性相反,一旦糖尿病患者患病,胰岛素在糖尿病患者中的作用似乎微乎其微,甚至为零。虽然高血糖导致大血管并发症的机制尚不清楚,但可能血糖本身仍然是最根本的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信