Time-related anticoagulation after regional and systemic administration of heparin in patients undergoing aortoiliac surgery

Bengt Lindblad , David Bergqvist , Thomas W. Wakefield , James C. Stanley
{"title":"Time-related anticoagulation after regional and systemic administration of heparin in patients undergoing aortoiliac surgery","authors":"Bengt Lindblad ,&nbsp;David Bergqvist ,&nbsp;Thomas W. Wakefield ,&nbsp;James C. Stanley","doi":"10.1016/S0950-821X(05)80593-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Heparin anticoagulation during cardiovascular surgical procedures remains poorly investigated and understood. The objective of this investigation was to assess the effectiveness of three methods of heparin administration. Heparin sulfate (75 IU/kg) administered to patients undergoing aortoiliac surgery was randomised to one of three methods: Group I (<em>n</em> = 9) heparin was injected into a central venous line 5 minutes before infrarenal aortic clamping; Group II (<em>n</em> = 9) heparin was injected into the distal aneurysm immediately after infrarenal aortic clamping; and Group III (<em>n</em> = 8) heparin was injected into a central venous line immediately after infrarenal aortic clamping. Blood samples were analysed for anticoagulant activity from both the upper and lower extremities at 5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes after heparin administration. Anticoagulation, as measured by aPTT, antifactor Xa levels, and ACT, was achieved in all three groups by 5 minutes, but initially with lower heparin activity (measured as antifactor Xa) in the upper extremity (Group II) and lower extremity (Group III), respectively. These differences were also evident in ACT and aPTT determinations. Intravenous heparin administration prior to aortic cross-clamping achieves excellent anticoagulation (anti-factor Xa ∼ 1 U/ml) in both upper and lower extremities after 5 minutes. With regional administration, rapid heparin redistribution occurs, but it takes longer to achieve the same level of anticoagulation distant from the site of administration. Nevertheless, from a practical perspective the method of administration does not appear to have a great influence on the eventual achievement of adequate anticoagulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77123,"journal":{"name":"European journal of vascular surgery","volume":"8 5","pages":"Pages 574-577"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-821X(05)80593-6","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950821X05805936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Heparin anticoagulation during cardiovascular surgical procedures remains poorly investigated and understood. The objective of this investigation was to assess the effectiveness of three methods of heparin administration. Heparin sulfate (75 IU/kg) administered to patients undergoing aortoiliac surgery was randomised to one of three methods: Group I (n = 9) heparin was injected into a central venous line 5 minutes before infrarenal aortic clamping; Group II (n = 9) heparin was injected into the distal aneurysm immediately after infrarenal aortic clamping; and Group III (n = 8) heparin was injected into a central venous line immediately after infrarenal aortic clamping. Blood samples were analysed for anticoagulant activity from both the upper and lower extremities at 5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes after heparin administration. Anticoagulation, as measured by aPTT, antifactor Xa levels, and ACT, was achieved in all three groups by 5 minutes, but initially with lower heparin activity (measured as antifactor Xa) in the upper extremity (Group II) and lower extremity (Group III), respectively. These differences were also evident in ACT and aPTT determinations. Intravenous heparin administration prior to aortic cross-clamping achieves excellent anticoagulation (anti-factor Xa ∼ 1 U/ml) in both upper and lower extremities after 5 minutes. With regional administration, rapid heparin redistribution occurs, but it takes longer to achieve the same level of anticoagulation distant from the site of administration. Nevertheless, from a practical perspective the method of administration does not appear to have a great influence on the eventual achievement of adequate anticoagulation.

髂主动脉手术患者局部和全身给药肝素后的时间相关性抗凝
在心血管外科手术过程中的肝素抗凝仍然缺乏研究和了解。本研究的目的是评估三种肝素给药方法的有效性。对髂主动脉手术患者给予硫酸肝素(75 IU/kg),随机分为三种方法之一:第一组(n = 9)在肾下主动脉夹持前5分钟将肝素注射到中心静脉;II组(n = 9)在肾下主动脉夹持后立即在动脉瘤远端注射肝素;III组(n = 8)在肾下主动脉夹紧后立即在中心静脉注射肝素。在给予肝素后5、15、30、60和120分钟,分析上肢和下肢血液样本的抗凝活性。通过aPTT、抗Xa因子水平和ACT测量的抗凝作用在所有三组中均在5分钟内达到,但最初上肢(II组)和下肢(III组)的肝素活性(以抗Xa因子测量)分别较低。这些差异在ACT和aPTT测定中也很明显。主动脉交叉夹持前静脉给药肝素可在5分钟后在上肢和下肢获得优异的抗凝效果(抗因子Xa ~ 1 U/ml)。在区域给药的情况下,肝素可以快速重新分配,但要在远离给药部位的地方达到相同的抗凝水平需要更长的时间。然而,从实际的角度来看,给药方法似乎对最终达到充分的抗凝作用没有很大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信