Is the transfusion requirement predictable in critically ill patients after admission to the intensive care unit?

T Bein, D Fröhlich, A Frey, C Metz, E Hansen, K Taeger
{"title":"Is the transfusion requirement predictable in critically ill patients after admission to the intensive care unit?","authors":"T Bein,&nbsp;D Fröhlich,&nbsp;A Frey,&nbsp;C Metz,&nbsp;E Hansen,&nbsp;K Taeger","doi":"10.1159/000223105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In intensive care medicine the clinical decision to order and transfuse red blood cells (RBC) is usually based on hematocrit or hemoglobin levels. The intention of this study was to investigate whether clinical or laboratory variables, taken after the admission of patients to the intensive care unit (ICU), are able to predict the transfusion requirement of the following 72 h.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The values of initially measured systolic blood pressure, hematocrit level, and the values of 2 scores of severity of disease (Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE-II], Mortality Prediction Model [MPM]) were calculated after the admission of patients to the ICU. The decision for transfusion was based on specific criteria. The median values of the scores, those of the variables, and the median number of transfused RBC units of the surviving group were compared to the values of the group of patients who died during hospital stay. The quantity of RBC transfusions was compared to the variables and score values by linear regression analysis. Additionally, the values of the patients who did not receive blood transfusion were compared to those of patients who required RBC. Furthermore, the patient group with neurosurgical diseases was compared to the group without neurosurgical diseases.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>117 patients were prospectively and consecutively investigated in an 8-bed ICU of a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nonsurvivors required significantly more units of RBC during the first 72 h (p < 0.05). Patients who did not require transfusion had a higher hematocrit and a lower APACHE-II value at admission (p < 0.001). In the MPM values no differences were found. Patients with neurosurgical diseases had a higher initial hematocrit value, and they required less units of RBC in comparison to patients without neurosurgical diseases. In the analysis of linear regression neither in the initially measured systolic blood pressure nor in the APACHE-II and MPM we found a strong linear correlation to the quantity of blood transfusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A hematocrit value < or = 20% and a APACHE-II score > or = 20 at the time of admission to the ICU referred to a demand for blood transfusion. We believe that these parameters are useful as predictive instruments. The initially measured systolic blood pressure had no prognostic capacity. In the individual patient a number of factors should be taken into account to decide whether to transfuse or not.</p>","PeriodicalId":13632,"journal":{"name":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","volume":"22 2","pages":"91-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000223105","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000223105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: In intensive care medicine the clinical decision to order and transfuse red blood cells (RBC) is usually based on hematocrit or hemoglobin levels. The intention of this study was to investigate whether clinical or laboratory variables, taken after the admission of patients to the intensive care unit (ICU), are able to predict the transfusion requirement of the following 72 h.

Design: The values of initially measured systolic blood pressure, hematocrit level, and the values of 2 scores of severity of disease (Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE-II], Mortality Prediction Model [MPM]) were calculated after the admission of patients to the ICU. The decision for transfusion was based on specific criteria. The median values of the scores, those of the variables, and the median number of transfused RBC units of the surviving group were compared to the values of the group of patients who died during hospital stay. The quantity of RBC transfusions was compared to the variables and score values by linear regression analysis. Additionally, the values of the patients who did not receive blood transfusion were compared to those of patients who required RBC. Furthermore, the patient group with neurosurgical diseases was compared to the group without neurosurgical diseases.

Patients: 117 patients were prospectively and consecutively investigated in an 8-bed ICU of a university hospital.

Results: Nonsurvivors required significantly more units of RBC during the first 72 h (p < 0.05). Patients who did not require transfusion had a higher hematocrit and a lower APACHE-II value at admission (p < 0.001). In the MPM values no differences were found. Patients with neurosurgical diseases had a higher initial hematocrit value, and they required less units of RBC in comparison to patients without neurosurgical diseases. In the analysis of linear regression neither in the initially measured systolic blood pressure nor in the APACHE-II and MPM we found a strong linear correlation to the quantity of blood transfusion.

Conclusions: A hematocrit value < or = 20% and a APACHE-II score > or = 20 at the time of admission to the ICU referred to a demand for blood transfusion. We believe that these parameters are useful as predictive instruments. The initially measured systolic blood pressure had no prognostic capacity. In the individual patient a number of factors should be taken into account to decide whether to transfuse or not.

危重病人入住加护病房后输血需要量是否可预测?
目的:在重症监护医学中,临床决定是否输注红细胞(RBC)通常是基于红细胞比容或血红蛋白水平。本研究的目的是调查患者进入重症监护病房(ICU)后的临床或实验室变量是否能够预测以下72 h的输血需求。计算患者入ICU后的初始收缩压、红细胞压积及2项疾病严重程度评分(急性生理与慢性健康评估[APACHE-II]、死亡率预测模型[MPM])值。输血的决定是基于特定的标准。将存活组的评分中位数、变量中位数和输血RBC单位中位数与住院期间死亡患者组的值进行比较。采用线性回归分析将红细胞输注量与各变量及评分值进行比较。此外,将未接受输血的患者与需要输血的患者的数值进行比较。此外,将有神经外科疾病的患者组与无神经外科疾病的患者组进行比较。患者:对某大学医院8床位ICU 117例患者进行前瞻性、连续性调查。结果:非幸存者在前72小时需要更多的红细胞单位(p < 0.05)。不需要输血的患者在入院时具有较高的红细胞压积和较低的APACHE-II值(p < 0.001)。在MPM值没有发现差异。神经外科疾病患者有更高的初始红细胞压积值,与没有神经外科疾病的患者相比,他们需要更少的红细胞单位。在对最初测量的收缩压、APACHE-II和MPM的线性回归分析中,我们发现输血量与收缩压有很强的线性相关性。结论:入ICU时,红细胞压积值<或= 20%,APACHE-II评分>或= 20,提示需要输血。我们认为这些参数是有用的预测工具。最初测量的收缩压没有预后能力。对于个别病人,在决定是否输血时应考虑到许多因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信