[Control processes in speech production: flexibility and determination of event related speech planning].

R Rummer, J Grabowski, C Vorwerg
{"title":"[Control processes in speech production: flexibility and determination of event related speech planning].","authors":"R Rummer,&nbsp;J Grabowski,&nbsp;C Vorwerg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The issue of our study is the flexibility of high level adjustments for the process of relating events. Our assumptions are based on the Mannheim Regulation Theory of Speech Production, in which three modes of central control are distinguished: stimulus control, schema control, and ad hoc control. Our first experiment shows that verbal accounts of an event (due to selection and construction processes) as well as the interindividual variability of this accounts (due to the control mode being less or more restricted) are strongly determined by the situational characteristics in which they are produced. In our second experiment, pressure of time is introduced into the speech production task as a disturbance factor to put some load on the attentional resources thus uncovering the flexibility vs. automaticity of the speech production process. A comparison of the results favors the assumption of verbal accounts of an event being produced by strong schematic control in a highly institutionalized situation, whereas verbal accounts of the same event in an unofficial, private situation are produced by more ad hoc planning. The results permit to psychologically reconstruct the narrating of events and the reporting of events as speech production processes which are guided by different control modes with respect to their flexibility and to their attentional demands.</p>","PeriodicalId":76858,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Psychologie mit Zeitschrift fur angewandte Psychologie","volume":"203 1","pages":"25-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Psychologie mit Zeitschrift fur angewandte Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The issue of our study is the flexibility of high level adjustments for the process of relating events. Our assumptions are based on the Mannheim Regulation Theory of Speech Production, in which three modes of central control are distinguished: stimulus control, schema control, and ad hoc control. Our first experiment shows that verbal accounts of an event (due to selection and construction processes) as well as the interindividual variability of this accounts (due to the control mode being less or more restricted) are strongly determined by the situational characteristics in which they are produced. In our second experiment, pressure of time is introduced into the speech production task as a disturbance factor to put some load on the attentional resources thus uncovering the flexibility vs. automaticity of the speech production process. A comparison of the results favors the assumption of verbal accounts of an event being produced by strong schematic control in a highly institutionalized situation, whereas verbal accounts of the same event in an unofficial, private situation are produced by more ad hoc planning. The results permit to psychologically reconstruct the narrating of events and the reporting of events as speech production processes which are guided by different control modes with respect to their flexibility and to their attentional demands.

[言语生产中的控制过程:与事件相关的言语策划的灵活性和确定性]。
我们研究的问题是对相关事件过程的高层次调整的灵活性。我们的假设基于曼海姆语言产生调节理论,该理论区分了三种中央控制模式:刺激控制、图式控制和特设控制。我们的第一个实验表明,对事件的口头描述(由于选择和构建过程)以及这种描述的个体间可变性(由于控制模式受到更少或更多的限制)在很大程度上取决于它们产生的情境特征。在我们的第二个实验中,我们将时间压力作为干扰因素引入语音生成任务中,以增加注意力资源的负荷,从而揭示语音生成过程的灵活性与自动性。结果的比较倾向于一个假设,即在高度制度化的情况下,对一个事件的口头描述是由强烈的图式控制产生的,而在非正式的、私人的情况下,对同一事件的口头描述是由更特别的计划产生的。研究结果允许我们从心理上重构事件的叙述和事件的报告作为语言生产过程,这些过程受到不同控制模式的灵活性和注意力需求的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信