Comparison of the effect of endothelium on the responses to sumatriptan in rabbit isolated iliac, mesenteric and carotid arteries.

O Yildiz, M Tuncer
{"title":"Comparison of the effect of endothelium on the responses to sumatriptan in rabbit isolated iliac, mesenteric and carotid arteries.","authors":"O Yildiz,&nbsp;M Tuncer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The contractions induced by the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and 5-HT1-like receptor agonist sumatriptan in open ring segments of rabbit iliac, mesenteric and common carotid arteries were studied isometrically in vitro. The alteration of the responses by removal of the endothelium and by inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase was investigated. 5-HT induced concentration-dependent contractions of all these three arterial segments. Sumatriptan did not induce any contraction of quiescent mesenteric and iliac arteries, but when a moderate tone was given with a threshold concentration of prostaglandin F2 alpha, it elicited contractions of both arteries (Emax values for sumatriptan in mesenteric and iliac arteries were 84.7% and 29.7% of the phenylephrine maximal effect and EC50 values were 0.22 +/- 0.14 and 0.33 +/- 0.06 microM, respectively). Sumatriptan had no contractile effect at all in carotid arteries in which 5-HT-induced contractions seemed to be mediated by 5-HT2 receptors only. Removal of the endothelium did not affect the responses to 5-HT in iliac, mesenteric and carotid arteries. The contractions induced by sumatriptan were not influenced by removal of the endothelium in the mesenteric artery, while sumatriptan responses were potentiated in the endothelium-denuded preparations of the iliac artery (Emax = 50.8% of the phenylphrine maximal effect; EC50 = 0.46 microM). L-NG-monomethyl arginine (100 microM), a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, also potentiated the sumatriptan responses in the endothelium-intact segments of the iliac artery. Indomethacin (0.1 microM), a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, did not affect the sumatriptan responses. These results suggest that sumatriptan-induced contractions of the rabbit iliac, but not mesenteric artery, were depressed by itself through the release of nitric oxide upon stimulation of 5-HT1-like receptors located on the endothelium, whereas neither on vascular smooth muscle nor on endothelium, 5-HT1-like receptors were present in the rabbit carotid artery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8166,"journal":{"name":"Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie","volume":"328 2","pages":"200-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The contractions induced by the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and 5-HT1-like receptor agonist sumatriptan in open ring segments of rabbit iliac, mesenteric and common carotid arteries were studied isometrically in vitro. The alteration of the responses by removal of the endothelium and by inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase was investigated. 5-HT induced concentration-dependent contractions of all these three arterial segments. Sumatriptan did not induce any contraction of quiescent mesenteric and iliac arteries, but when a moderate tone was given with a threshold concentration of prostaglandin F2 alpha, it elicited contractions of both arteries (Emax values for sumatriptan in mesenteric and iliac arteries were 84.7% and 29.7% of the phenylephrine maximal effect and EC50 values were 0.22 +/- 0.14 and 0.33 +/- 0.06 microM, respectively). Sumatriptan had no contractile effect at all in carotid arteries in which 5-HT-induced contractions seemed to be mediated by 5-HT2 receptors only. Removal of the endothelium did not affect the responses to 5-HT in iliac, mesenteric and carotid arteries. The contractions induced by sumatriptan were not influenced by removal of the endothelium in the mesenteric artery, while sumatriptan responses were potentiated in the endothelium-denuded preparations of the iliac artery (Emax = 50.8% of the phenylphrine maximal effect; EC50 = 0.46 microM). L-NG-monomethyl arginine (100 microM), a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, also potentiated the sumatriptan responses in the endothelium-intact segments of the iliac artery. Indomethacin (0.1 microM), a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, did not affect the sumatriptan responses. These results suggest that sumatriptan-induced contractions of the rabbit iliac, but not mesenteric artery, were depressed by itself through the release of nitric oxide upon stimulation of 5-HT1-like receptors located on the endothelium, whereas neither on vascular smooth muscle nor on endothelium, 5-HT1-like receptors were present in the rabbit carotid artery.

内皮对兔离体髂动脉、肠系膜动脉和颈动脉对舒马匹坦反应影响的比较。
在体外等距研究了5-羟色胺(5-HT)和5-羟色胺样受体激动剂舒马匹坦对兔髂动脉、肠系膜动脉和颈总动脉开放环段的收缩作用。研究了内皮细胞去除和一氧化氮合酶和环加氧酶抑制剂对反应的影响。5-HT诱导了这三个动脉段的浓度依赖性收缩。舒马曲坦对处于静止状态的肠系膜动脉和髂动脉没有任何收缩作用,但当给予前列腺素F2 α阈值浓度的适度张力时,舒马曲坦对肠系膜动脉和髂动脉的Emax值分别为苯肾上腺素最大作用的84.7%和29.7%,EC50值分别为0.22 +/- 0.14和0.33 +/- 0.06微米)。舒马曲坦在颈动脉中完全没有收缩作用,其中5-HT2受体似乎仅介导5-HT2诱导的收缩。去除内皮不影响髂动脉、肠系膜动脉和颈动脉对5-HT的反应。舒马匹坦诱导的收缩不受肠系膜动脉内皮去除的影响,而在去内皮的髂动脉制剂中舒马匹坦的反应增强(Emax =苯基弗林最大效应的50.8%;EC50 = 0.46微米)。l - ng -单甲基精氨酸(100微米),一种一氧化氮合酶抑制剂,也增强了苏马匹坦在髂动脉内皮完整部分的反应。吲哚美辛(0.1微米),环加氧酶抑制剂,不影响舒马匹坦的反应。这些结果表明,舒马匹坦通过刺激位于内皮上的5- ht1样受体释放一氧化氮来抑制兔髂而非肠系膜动脉的收缩,而在血管平滑肌和内皮上均没有5- ht1样受体存在于兔颈动脉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信