Gastroesophageal reflux in children.

Surgery annual Pub Date : 1995-01-01
C E Bagwell
{"title":"Gastroesophageal reflux in children.","authors":"C E Bagwell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whereas all of these surgical modifications and new approaches are somewhat preliminary and have yet to achieve widespread clinical application, they illustrate an awareness of shortcomings in the present operative management of reflux as well as a gradual disenchantment with complications seen in many children, especially the neurologically impaired. However, the final analysis of surgical treatment for these children should not be viewed in an overly pessimistic light. Strategies for management of gastroesophageal reflux remain multifaceted, and operative intervention has a laudable role in the relief of symptoms for many afflicted children. However, the child's presentation and symptomatology should be predominant in planning therapy, operative or otherwise. It is the goal of this review to point out several points in this respect: 1. The diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux may be difficult to pinpoint. 2. Multiple tests for reflux may offer conflicting results. 3. Clinical presentations associated with reflux do respond to treatment, which may include operative intervention. 4. The risks of anti-reflux procedures are greater than have been previously recognized, especially in the chronically ill and neurologically impaired child. 5. New approaches offer some promise to lower the risks of complications inherent in operative treatment of pathologic gastroesophageal reflux. 6. The best management plan for surgical treatment of reflux in children is evolving with less of a conviction for \"prophylactic\" fundoplication procedures, especially in the neurologically impaired child, and there is a recognition that underlying motility disorders may require modification of the operative approach or even the decision to operate. It is only through an awareness of the significant benefits as well as the considerable risks of operative treatment that the contemporary surgeon can best serve the interests of a child with gastroesophageal reflux. It is hoped that these guidelines will be helpful in this regard.</p>","PeriodicalId":76570,"journal":{"name":"Surgery annual","volume":"27 ","pages":"133-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery annual","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whereas all of these surgical modifications and new approaches are somewhat preliminary and have yet to achieve widespread clinical application, they illustrate an awareness of shortcomings in the present operative management of reflux as well as a gradual disenchantment with complications seen in many children, especially the neurologically impaired. However, the final analysis of surgical treatment for these children should not be viewed in an overly pessimistic light. Strategies for management of gastroesophageal reflux remain multifaceted, and operative intervention has a laudable role in the relief of symptoms for many afflicted children. However, the child's presentation and symptomatology should be predominant in planning therapy, operative or otherwise. It is the goal of this review to point out several points in this respect: 1. The diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux may be difficult to pinpoint. 2. Multiple tests for reflux may offer conflicting results. 3. Clinical presentations associated with reflux do respond to treatment, which may include operative intervention. 4. The risks of anti-reflux procedures are greater than have been previously recognized, especially in the chronically ill and neurologically impaired child. 5. New approaches offer some promise to lower the risks of complications inherent in operative treatment of pathologic gastroesophageal reflux. 6. The best management plan for surgical treatment of reflux in children is evolving with less of a conviction for "prophylactic" fundoplication procedures, especially in the neurologically impaired child, and there is a recognition that underlying motility disorders may require modification of the operative approach or even the decision to operate. It is only through an awareness of the significant benefits as well as the considerable risks of operative treatment that the contemporary surgeon can best serve the interests of a child with gastroesophageal reflux. It is hoped that these guidelines will be helpful in this regard.

儿童胃食管反流
尽管所有这些手术改良和新方法都是初步的,尚未实现广泛的临床应用,但它们表明,人们意识到目前反流手术治疗的缺点,以及许多儿童,特别是神经受损儿童的并发症逐渐消失。然而,对这些儿童进行手术治疗的最终分析不应过于悲观。管理胃食管反流的策略仍然是多方面的,手术干预在缓解许多患病儿童的症状方面具有值得称赞的作用。然而,儿童的表现和症状应在计划治疗,手术或其他方面占主导地位。本文的目的是在这方面指出几点:1。胃食管反流的诊断可能很难精确。2. 多次反流测试可能会提供相互矛盾的结果。3.与反流相关的临床表现确实对治疗有反应,其中可能包括手术干预。4. 抗反流手术的风险比以前认识到的要大,特别是在慢性疾病和神经受损的儿童中。5. 新的方法提供了一些希望,以降低手术治疗病理性胃食管反流固有的并发症的风险。6. 儿童反流手术治疗的最佳管理方案正在不断发展,对“预防性”基底折叠手术的信念越来越少,特别是在神经受损的儿童中,人们认识到潜在的运动障碍可能需要改变手术入路,甚至决定手术。当代外科医生只有认识到手术治疗的显著益处和相当大的风险,才能最好地服务于胃食管反流患儿的利益。希望这些准则将在这方面有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信