A comparison of imaging techniques in patients with chronic sinusitis (X-ray, MRI, A-mode ultrasound).

R M Katz, S Friedman, M Diament, S C Siegel, G S Rachelefsky, S L Spector, A S Rohr, J Schoettler, A Dorris
{"title":"A comparison of imaging techniques in patients with chronic sinusitis (X-ray, MRI, A-mode ultrasound).","authors":"R M Katz,&nbsp;S Friedman,&nbsp;M Diament,&nbsp;S C Siegel,&nbsp;G S Rachelefsky,&nbsp;S L Spector,&nbsp;A S Rohr,&nbsp;J Schoettler,&nbsp;A Dorris","doi":"10.2500/108854195778690273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thirty-five patients age 9 to 67 were evaluated for chronic sinusitis by history, physical and laboratory examination, and imaging techniques (X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and flexible rhinoscopy). MRI was the most predictive. To establish the diagnosis of sinusitis, it was more sensitive than plain X-ray for intrasinus disease. Findings of edema, erythema, and drainage on flexible rhinoscopy were consistent with chronic sinusitis and were confirmed by MRI and sinus X-rays in 41% of the cases. Nasal smears for polymorphonuclear cells and eosinophils were suggestive of a diagnosis of chronic sinusitis, but other laboratory tests (CBC, sedimentation rate, quantitative immunoglobulins, total IgEs) were of very limited value in the diagnosis of chronic sinusitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7423,"journal":{"name":"Allergy proceedings : the official journal of regional and state allergy societies","volume":"16 3","pages":"123-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/108854195778690273","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy proceedings : the official journal of regional and state allergy societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/108854195778690273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Thirty-five patients age 9 to 67 were evaluated for chronic sinusitis by history, physical and laboratory examination, and imaging techniques (X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and flexible rhinoscopy). MRI was the most predictive. To establish the diagnosis of sinusitis, it was more sensitive than plain X-ray for intrasinus disease. Findings of edema, erythema, and drainage on flexible rhinoscopy were consistent with chronic sinusitis and were confirmed by MRI and sinus X-rays in 41% of the cases. Nasal smears for polymorphonuclear cells and eosinophils were suggestive of a diagnosis of chronic sinusitis, but other laboratory tests (CBC, sedimentation rate, quantitative immunoglobulins, total IgEs) were of very limited value in the diagnosis of chronic sinusitis.

慢性鼻窦炎患者影像学技术的比较(x线、MRI、A超)。
通过病史、体格和实验室检查以及影像学技术(x线、磁共振成像(MRI)和柔性鼻镜)对35例9至67岁的慢性鼻窦炎患者进行评估。核磁共振成像是最具预测性的。对于鼻窦炎的诊断,它比x线平片更敏感。软性鼻镜检查的水肿、红斑和引流表现与慢性鼻窦炎一致,41%的病例经MRI和鼻窦x线检查证实。鼻涂片检测多形核细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞提示慢性鼻窦炎的诊断,但其他实验室检查(CBC、沉降率、定量免疫球蛋白、总IgEs)对慢性鼻窦炎的诊断价值非常有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信