Transurethral prostatectomy (TURP): still the gold standard?

Journal d'urologie Pub Date : 1995-01-01
R Hartung
{"title":"Transurethral prostatectomy (TURP): still the gold standard?","authors":"R Hartung","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>1. The indication for treating BPH can be established very precisely today. It is important to select the alternative procedures with a good workup for individual therapy. 2. A large volume prostate with proven obstruction is an indication for TURP or open prostatectomy, still the best choice of treatment with the best longterm results concerning all obstructive parameters. In future there may be less surgery due to the other possibilities but teaching and handling the gold standard should not be forgotten in using alternative techniques. 3. Especially for high risk patients there are minimal invasive methods so that a permanent catheter in a patient should be an exception. 4. Also with new medications we expect better results. Prostate selective alpha-blockers and reduction inhibitors probably also in combination of both may be sufficient therapy for many patients. It has to be examined whether minimal invasive instrumental treatments like transurethral thermotherapy can be compared with medication. The most important result of the discussion in the last years was improving the clinical workup for finding the indication for surgery. Too many new instrumental methods appeared at the same time and we are in a period of selection and investigation to know which technique can be compared with the gold standard of TURP. Also in using minimal invasive therapy the indication must be very clear because also the new techniques are not totally free from complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":77191,"journal":{"name":"Journal d'urologie","volume":"101 1","pages":"18-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal d'urologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1. The indication for treating BPH can be established very precisely today. It is important to select the alternative procedures with a good workup for individual therapy. 2. A large volume prostate with proven obstruction is an indication for TURP or open prostatectomy, still the best choice of treatment with the best longterm results concerning all obstructive parameters. In future there may be less surgery due to the other possibilities but teaching and handling the gold standard should not be forgotten in using alternative techniques. 3. Especially for high risk patients there are minimal invasive methods so that a permanent catheter in a patient should be an exception. 4. Also with new medications we expect better results. Prostate selective alpha-blockers and reduction inhibitors probably also in combination of both may be sufficient therapy for many patients. It has to be examined whether minimal invasive instrumental treatments like transurethral thermotherapy can be compared with medication. The most important result of the discussion in the last years was improving the clinical workup for finding the indication for surgery. Too many new instrumental methods appeared at the same time and we are in a period of selection and investigation to know which technique can be compared with the gold standard of TURP. Also in using minimal invasive therapy the indication must be very clear because also the new techniques are not totally free from complications.

经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP):仍然是金标准吗?
1. 治疗前列腺增生症的适应症今天可以非常精确地确定。重要的是要选择替代程序与良好的工作,个别治疗。2. 证实梗阻的大体积前列腺是TURP或开放性前列腺切除术的适应症,对于所有梗阻参数而言,仍然是长期效果最好的治疗选择。将来可能会有更少的手术,因为其他的可能性,但教学和处理黄金标准不应该在使用替代技术中被遗忘。3.特别是对于高危患者,有微创方法,因此在患者中放置永久导管应该是一个例外。4. 同时,我们期待新的药物能带来更好的效果。前列腺选择性α -受体阻滞剂和还原抑制剂联合使用对许多患者来说可能是足够的治疗方法。必须检查微创器械治疗,如经尿道热疗是否可以与药物治疗相比较。过去几年讨论的最重要的结果是改善了临床检查,以找到手术的指征。同时出现了太多新的仪器方法,我们正处于选择和调查的阶段,以了解哪种技术可以与TURP的金标准相比较。同样,在使用微创治疗时,适应症必须非常明确,因为新技术并不是完全没有并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信