Prophylaxis in bowel surgery.

R L Nichols, J W Holmes
{"title":"Prophylaxis in bowel surgery.","authors":"R L Nichols,&nbsp;J W Holmes","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The busy colon and rectal surgeon deals daily with a sea of bacteria. Using good surgical judgment as well as time-honored techniques and innovative equipment the postoperative results are generally good. The role that appropriately administered efficacious antibiotics play in this scenario should not be underestimated and can only be realized when historical controls are evaluated. The results of these studies of antibiotic bowel preparation suggest that many different approaches may be equally effective in reducing infection after elective colonic resection. Certain features, however, appear to be common to most of the studies. 1 Oral antibiotic regimens with both aerobic and anaerobic activity (e.g., neomycin/erythromycin base) were used. 2 The oral agents were given in limited doses the day before operation. 3 Addition of systemic antibiotic agents without broad-spectrum coverage to the oral regimen generally did not improve the results. 4 Use of broad-spectrum parenteral antibiotic agents alone was associated with a lower infection rate than the use of systemic agents having only limited coverage. 5 Addition of a broad-spectrum parenteral antibiotic to the oral antibiotics may further reduce the postoperative infection rate. 6 Parenteral or oral antibiotics should be administered only for short periods of time during the perioperative period. Since the general acceptance of the approach outlined above, infection rates have decreased and the number of clinical studies reported has drastically decreased. The authors do feel, however, that there is a need for further study to outline possible benefits of other appropriate regimens (34).</p>","PeriodicalId":77088,"journal":{"name":"Current clinical topics in infectious diseases","volume":"15 ","pages":"76-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current clinical topics in infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The busy colon and rectal surgeon deals daily with a sea of bacteria. Using good surgical judgment as well as time-honored techniques and innovative equipment the postoperative results are generally good. The role that appropriately administered efficacious antibiotics play in this scenario should not be underestimated and can only be realized when historical controls are evaluated. The results of these studies of antibiotic bowel preparation suggest that many different approaches may be equally effective in reducing infection after elective colonic resection. Certain features, however, appear to be common to most of the studies. 1 Oral antibiotic regimens with both aerobic and anaerobic activity (e.g., neomycin/erythromycin base) were used. 2 The oral agents were given in limited doses the day before operation. 3 Addition of systemic antibiotic agents without broad-spectrum coverage to the oral regimen generally did not improve the results. 4 Use of broad-spectrum parenteral antibiotic agents alone was associated with a lower infection rate than the use of systemic agents having only limited coverage. 5 Addition of a broad-spectrum parenteral antibiotic to the oral antibiotics may further reduce the postoperative infection rate. 6 Parenteral or oral antibiotics should be administered only for short periods of time during the perioperative period. Since the general acceptance of the approach outlined above, infection rates have decreased and the number of clinical studies reported has drastically decreased. The authors do feel, however, that there is a need for further study to outline possible benefits of other appropriate regimens (34).

预防肠手术。
忙碌的结肠直肠外科医生每天都要处理大量的细菌。运用良好的手术判断以及历史悠久的技术和创新的设备,术后效果一般都很好。在这种情况下,适当施用有效抗生素的作用不应被低估,只有在评估历史控制时才能实现。这些抗生素肠道准备的研究结果表明,许多不同的方法可能同样有效地减少选择性结肠切除术后的感染。然而,某些特征在大多数研究中似乎是共同的。使用了有氧和厌氧活性的口服抗生素方案(例如,新霉素/红霉素碱)。2术前1天给予有限剂量口服药物。在口服方案中加入无广谱覆盖的全身性抗生素药物一般不会改善结果。单独使用广谱肠外抗生素比使用覆盖范围有限的全身抗生素的感染率更低。在口服抗生素基础上加用广谱肠外抗生素可进一步降低术后感染率。围手术期应在短时间内使用肠外或口服抗生素。自从普遍接受上述方法以来,感染率已经下降,临床研究报告的数量也急剧减少。然而,作者确实认为有必要进行进一步的研究,以概述其他适当方案的可能益处(34)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信