A Gibson, S R Brave, I McFadzean, J F Tucker, C Wayman
{"title":"The nitrergic transmitter of the anococcygeus--NO or not?","authors":"A Gibson, S R Brave, I McFadzean, J F Tucker, C Wayman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nonadrenergic noncholinergic (NANC) relaxations of the anococcygeus muscle are reduced by inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Since NOS can be detected within 6-hydroxydodpamine-resistant nerve tracts running through the muscle, it seems clear that these NANC relaxations result from activation of the L-arginine/NO pathway within the prejunctional nerve terminal, an example of so-called \"nitrergic\" transmission. However, a number of substances (hydroquinone, superoxide anions, hydroxocobalamin) profoundly reduce relaxations to exogenous NO but do not affect those to nitrergic field stimulation; such observations have raised questions over the nature of the substance actually released from the nitrergic nerves. Several possible explanations are discussed: (1) NO is released attached to a carrier molecule, perhaps in the form of a nitrosothiol; (2) NO is released in a modified redox form; (3) NO is released as a free radical, but is protected within the neuroeffector junction by other substances which preferentially interact with scavenger molecules; and (4) NO is released as a free radical and, because of a rapid and unhindered rate of diffusion over short distances (100-200 microM), it is less susceptible than exogenous NO to scavenger molecules. As yet, there is insufficient experimental evidence to decide which, if any, of these explanations is correct.</p>","PeriodicalId":8166,"journal":{"name":"Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie","volume":"329 1","pages":"39-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nonadrenergic noncholinergic (NANC) relaxations of the anococcygeus muscle are reduced by inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Since NOS can be detected within 6-hydroxydodpamine-resistant nerve tracts running through the muscle, it seems clear that these NANC relaxations result from activation of the L-arginine/NO pathway within the prejunctional nerve terminal, an example of so-called "nitrergic" transmission. However, a number of substances (hydroquinone, superoxide anions, hydroxocobalamin) profoundly reduce relaxations to exogenous NO but do not affect those to nitrergic field stimulation; such observations have raised questions over the nature of the substance actually released from the nitrergic nerves. Several possible explanations are discussed: (1) NO is released attached to a carrier molecule, perhaps in the form of a nitrosothiol; (2) NO is released in a modified redox form; (3) NO is released as a free radical, but is protected within the neuroeffector junction by other substances which preferentially interact with scavenger molecules; and (4) NO is released as a free radical and, because of a rapid and unhindered rate of diffusion over short distances (100-200 microM), it is less susceptible than exogenous NO to scavenger molecules. As yet, there is insufficient experimental evidence to decide which, if any, of these explanations is correct.