The nitrergic transmitter of the anococcygeus--NO or not?

A Gibson, S R Brave, I McFadzean, J F Tucker, C Wayman
{"title":"The nitrergic transmitter of the anococcygeus--NO or not?","authors":"A Gibson,&nbsp;S R Brave,&nbsp;I McFadzean,&nbsp;J F Tucker,&nbsp;C Wayman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nonadrenergic noncholinergic (NANC) relaxations of the anococcygeus muscle are reduced by inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Since NOS can be detected within 6-hydroxydodpamine-resistant nerve tracts running through the muscle, it seems clear that these NANC relaxations result from activation of the L-arginine/NO pathway within the prejunctional nerve terminal, an example of so-called \"nitrergic\" transmission. However, a number of substances (hydroquinone, superoxide anions, hydroxocobalamin) profoundly reduce relaxations to exogenous NO but do not affect those to nitrergic field stimulation; such observations have raised questions over the nature of the substance actually released from the nitrergic nerves. Several possible explanations are discussed: (1) NO is released attached to a carrier molecule, perhaps in the form of a nitrosothiol; (2) NO is released in a modified redox form; (3) NO is released as a free radical, but is protected within the neuroeffector junction by other substances which preferentially interact with scavenger molecules; and (4) NO is released as a free radical and, because of a rapid and unhindered rate of diffusion over short distances (100-200 microM), it is less susceptible than exogenous NO to scavenger molecules. As yet, there is insufficient experimental evidence to decide which, if any, of these explanations is correct.</p>","PeriodicalId":8166,"journal":{"name":"Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie","volume":"329 1","pages":"39-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nonadrenergic noncholinergic (NANC) relaxations of the anococcygeus muscle are reduced by inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Since NOS can be detected within 6-hydroxydodpamine-resistant nerve tracts running through the muscle, it seems clear that these NANC relaxations result from activation of the L-arginine/NO pathway within the prejunctional nerve terminal, an example of so-called "nitrergic" transmission. However, a number of substances (hydroquinone, superoxide anions, hydroxocobalamin) profoundly reduce relaxations to exogenous NO but do not affect those to nitrergic field stimulation; such observations have raised questions over the nature of the substance actually released from the nitrergic nerves. Several possible explanations are discussed: (1) NO is released attached to a carrier molecule, perhaps in the form of a nitrosothiol; (2) NO is released in a modified redox form; (3) NO is released as a free radical, but is protected within the neuroeffector junction by other substances which preferentially interact with scavenger molecules; and (4) NO is released as a free radical and, because of a rapid and unhindered rate of diffusion over short distances (100-200 microM), it is less susceptible than exogenous NO to scavenger molecules. As yet, there is insufficient experimental evidence to decide which, if any, of these explanations is correct.

无尾肌的氮递质——NO还是NO ?
一氧化氮合酶(NOS)抑制剂可降低无尾肌的非肾上腺素能-非胆碱能(NANC)松弛。由于NOS可以在穿过肌肉的6-羟多巴胺抗性神经束中检测到,因此很明显,这些NANC松弛是由突触前神经末梢内l -精氨酸/NO通路的激活引起的,这是所谓的“氮能”传递的一个例子。然而,一些物质(对苯二酚、超氧阴离子、羟钴胺素)深刻地减少对外源性NO的松弛,但不影响对氮场刺激的松弛;这样的观察结果引起了人们对从能神经中释放的物质的性质的质疑。讨论了几种可能的解释:(1)NO附着在载体分子上释放,可能以亚硝基硫醇的形式释放;(2) NO以改性的氧化还原形式释放;(3) NO作为自由基释放,但在神经效应器连接处受到其他物质的保护,这些物质优先与清道夫分子相互作用;(4) NO以自由基的形式释放,由于其在短距离(100-200微米)内的扩散速度迅速且不受阻碍,因此它比外源NO更不容易受到清除剂分子的影响。到目前为止,没有足够的实验证据来决定这些解释中哪一个是正确的,如果有的话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信