The penumbra, therapeutic time window and acute ischaemic stroke.

Bailliere's clinical neurology Pub Date : 1995-08-01
M Fisher, K Takano
{"title":"The penumbra, therapeutic time window and acute ischaemic stroke.","authors":"M Fisher,&nbsp;K Takano","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a great deal of evidence that an ischaemic penumbra exists in animals and humans after the occurrence of focal brain ischaemia (Hossmann, 1994). The concept of the penumbra leads to the idea of a therapeutic time window. Because, if the region of irreversible injury (infarction) after focal ischaemia evolves in time and space, then the possibility of therapy to interfere becomes a tenable hypothesis. All of the acute stroke therapies given after onset have their basis from this hypothesis of a therapeutic time window (Fisher, 1995). As previously alluded to, a more apt term might be a window-shade, because this metaphor suggests a more dynamic event. The time and location of potentially salvageable ischaemic brain tissue after ischaemic stroke is a moving target and many unanswered questions remain. The data from animal stroke models support 2-3 hours as the time when intervention is likely to be beneficial in rats. Non-human primate data are scarce, but the few studies available do imply that at 3-4 hours after stroke onset some ischaemic tissue remains potentially salvageable. In humans, we really do not know what the time window is and we must remember that it is likely to be highly variable among individuals. This variability relates to many factors including the status of collateral flow, patient age, coexistent metabolic abnormalities (i.e. hyperglycaemia), premorbid medications and many other confounding variables. All acute stroke intervention trials are trying to initiate therapy within 6-8 hours after onset and the earlier, presumably the better. However, this approach is based upon population averaging, since we have had no convenient and reliable mechanism to determine, if an individual patient has viable tissue when therapy can be started. The availability of an imaging modality that could distinguish the presence and extent of salvageable ischaemic tissue would greatly facilitate stroke therapy trials and ultimately the selection of patients when proven therapies are available. The new MRI techniques might afford this possibility. As we enter the exciting era of effective therapy for acute ischaemic stroke, the issues surrounding the therapeutic time window(shade) will become more critical, because it is this critical time that will define the success or failure of our interventions. Therefore it is incumbent upon basic stroke researchers and clinicians to continue to define the ischaemic penumbra and to develop readily applicable mechanisms to identify and treat this moving target.</p>","PeriodicalId":77030,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical neurology","volume":"4 2","pages":"279-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a great deal of evidence that an ischaemic penumbra exists in animals and humans after the occurrence of focal brain ischaemia (Hossmann, 1994). The concept of the penumbra leads to the idea of a therapeutic time window. Because, if the region of irreversible injury (infarction) after focal ischaemia evolves in time and space, then the possibility of therapy to interfere becomes a tenable hypothesis. All of the acute stroke therapies given after onset have their basis from this hypothesis of a therapeutic time window (Fisher, 1995). As previously alluded to, a more apt term might be a window-shade, because this metaphor suggests a more dynamic event. The time and location of potentially salvageable ischaemic brain tissue after ischaemic stroke is a moving target and many unanswered questions remain. The data from animal stroke models support 2-3 hours as the time when intervention is likely to be beneficial in rats. Non-human primate data are scarce, but the few studies available do imply that at 3-4 hours after stroke onset some ischaemic tissue remains potentially salvageable. In humans, we really do not know what the time window is and we must remember that it is likely to be highly variable among individuals. This variability relates to many factors including the status of collateral flow, patient age, coexistent metabolic abnormalities (i.e. hyperglycaemia), premorbid medications and many other confounding variables. All acute stroke intervention trials are trying to initiate therapy within 6-8 hours after onset and the earlier, presumably the better. However, this approach is based upon population averaging, since we have had no convenient and reliable mechanism to determine, if an individual patient has viable tissue when therapy can be started. The availability of an imaging modality that could distinguish the presence and extent of salvageable ischaemic tissue would greatly facilitate stroke therapy trials and ultimately the selection of patients when proven therapies are available. The new MRI techniques might afford this possibility. As we enter the exciting era of effective therapy for acute ischaemic stroke, the issues surrounding the therapeutic time window(shade) will become more critical, because it is this critical time that will define the success or failure of our interventions. Therefore it is incumbent upon basic stroke researchers and clinicians to continue to define the ischaemic penumbra and to develop readily applicable mechanisms to identify and treat this moving target.

半暗带、治疗时间窗与急性缺血性脑卒中。
大量证据表明,动物和人类发生局灶性脑缺血后存在缺血半影(Hossmann, 1994)。半影带的概念引出了治疗时间窗的概念。因为,如果局灶性缺血后的不可逆损伤(梗死)区域在时间和空间上发生变化,那么治疗干预的可能性就成为一个站住脚的假设。所有在发病后给予的急性中风治疗都基于这种治疗时间窗的假设(Fisher, 1995)。如前所述,一个更合适的术语可能是窗帘,因为这个比喻暗示了一个更动态的事件。缺血性脑卒中后可能恢复的缺血脑组织的时间和位置是一个移动的目标,许多未解决的问题仍然存在。动物中风模型的数据支持2-3小时作为干预可能对大鼠有益的时间。非人类灵长类动物的数据很少,但为数不多的研究确实表明,在中风发作后3-4小时,一些缺血组织仍有可能恢复。在人类中,我们真的不知道时间窗口是什么,我们必须记住,它在个体之间可能是高度可变的。这种可变性与许多因素有关,包括侧支血流状态、患者年龄、共存的代谢异常(如高血糖)、病前药物和许多其他混杂变量。所有急性卒中干预试验都试图在发病后6-8小时内开始治疗,而且越早越好。然而,这种方法是基于群体平均,因为我们没有方便可靠的机制来确定,如果一个病人有活的组织,何时可以开始治疗。一种能够区分可挽救的缺血组织的存在和程度的成像方式的可用性将极大地促进中风治疗试验,并最终在经过验证的治疗方法可用时选择患者。新的核磁共振成像技术可能提供这种可能性。随着我们进入急性缺血性中风有效治疗的激动人心的时代,围绕治疗时间窗口(阴影)的问题将变得更加关键,因为这是决定我们干预措施成功或失败的关键时刻。因此,基础卒中研究人员和临床医生有责任继续定义缺血半影区,并开发易于应用的机制来识别和治疗这一运动靶标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信