[Psychopathological dynamics of suicidal behavior in childhood and puberty].

Psychiatria clinica Pub Date : 1980-01-01
E Lange, F Ficker
{"title":"[Psychopathological dynamics of suicidal behavior in childhood and puberty].","authors":"E Lange,&nbsp;F Ficker","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The oversimplifying and scientifically untenable separation of suicide (successful) and attempted suicide (unsuccessful) was overcome by Stengel's fundamental findings that only very few attempted suicides are failed suicides, and that the majority of attempted suicides are acts a qualitatively distinct character. Psycho(patho)dynamic analyses of suicidal acts disclosed that in a portion of the suicide attempts there is no or at least no determined suicidal intent. The definition of 'suicidal attempt' which has come into general use is therefore imprecise, because in many cases suicide is not \"attempted\" but the technique of suicidal behaviour is only used for a primary non-suicidal purpose. A differential typology of the entire content of the concept of 'suicide attempt' which includes vague non-homogeneous matters has become unavoidable and is being discussed here. In the suicidal behaviour of children the problems become even clearer. The 'suicide attempt' in children does not meet Stengel's criteria. The great majority of cases are not 'attempted' suicides, do not show a final determination, do not come about in a calculated manner, and are not based on an ambivalence about life and death, but are rather a potentially fatal substitution by suicidal behaviour for a demonstrative appeal for help, for a resigned escape signal or for an impulsive cry. Neither can one recognize the development of the pre-suicidal syndrome described by Ringel.</p>","PeriodicalId":76382,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatria clinica","volume":"13 2","pages":"96-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatria clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The oversimplifying and scientifically untenable separation of suicide (successful) and attempted suicide (unsuccessful) was overcome by Stengel's fundamental findings that only very few attempted suicides are failed suicides, and that the majority of attempted suicides are acts a qualitatively distinct character. Psycho(patho)dynamic analyses of suicidal acts disclosed that in a portion of the suicide attempts there is no or at least no determined suicidal intent. The definition of 'suicidal attempt' which has come into general use is therefore imprecise, because in many cases suicide is not "attempted" but the technique of suicidal behaviour is only used for a primary non-suicidal purpose. A differential typology of the entire content of the concept of 'suicide attempt' which includes vague non-homogeneous matters has become unavoidable and is being discussed here. In the suicidal behaviour of children the problems become even clearer. The 'suicide attempt' in children does not meet Stengel's criteria. The great majority of cases are not 'attempted' suicides, do not show a final determination, do not come about in a calculated manner, and are not based on an ambivalence about life and death, but are rather a potentially fatal substitution by suicidal behaviour for a demonstrative appeal for help, for a resigned escape signal or for an impulsive cry. Neither can one recognize the development of the pre-suicidal syndrome described by Ringel.

[儿童和青春期自杀行为的精神病理动力学]。
对于自杀(成功)和自杀未遂(不成功)的过分简化和科学上站不住脚的区分被Stengel的基本发现所克服,即只有极少数的自杀未遂是失败的自杀,而大多数自杀未遂都是具有不同性质的行为。对自杀行为的心理(病理)动态分析表明,在一部分自杀企图中没有或至少没有确定的自杀意图。因此,普遍使用的“自杀企图”的定义是不精确的,因为在许多情况下,自杀不是“企图”,而是自杀行为的技术仅用于主要的非自杀目的。“自杀企图”概念的整个内容的不同类型学,包括模糊的非同质问题,已经成为不可避免的,这里正在讨论。在儿童的自杀行为中,问题变得更加明显。儿童的“自杀企图”不符合斯坦格尔的标准。绝大多数案例并不是“企图”自杀,没有表现出最终的决心,没有经过深思熟虑,也不是基于对生与死的矛盾心理,而是用自杀行为代替了一种潜在的致命的求助,一种顺从的逃跑信号或一种冲动的哭泣。也没有人能认识到Ringel所描述的自杀前综合症的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书