The principle of separate responsibility in clinical psychiatric practice. 6 years' experience.

J A Bleeker, M L Frohn-de Winter
{"title":"The principle of separate responsibility in clinical psychiatric practice. 6 years' experience.","authors":"J A Bleeker,&nbsp;M L Frohn-de Winter","doi":"10.1159/000283917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An experiment lasting 6 years with an organizational principle called 'separate responsibility' is described. Its aim was to promote open two-way communication in an acute psychiatric admission clinic, by dividing power, i.e. responsibility for individual patients and patients as a group, over two multidisciplinary treatment teams. Multidisciplinarity, however, turned out to be impossible to maintain for different reasons. Instead, a splitting occurred of medical and nursing disciplines through identification of the former with individual treatment and of the latter with the patient groups. An unproductive loss of common treatment goals was the result leading to a near closing down of the clinic. Putting medical and nursing personnel into one team, responsible for the entire treatment of the unit, restored productivity and improved treatment and the working climate.</p>","PeriodicalId":76382,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatria clinica","volume":"14 4","pages":"189-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000283917","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatria clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000283917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An experiment lasting 6 years with an organizational principle called 'separate responsibility' is described. Its aim was to promote open two-way communication in an acute psychiatric admission clinic, by dividing power, i.e. responsibility for individual patients and patients as a group, over two multidisciplinary treatment teams. Multidisciplinarity, however, turned out to be impossible to maintain for different reasons. Instead, a splitting occurred of medical and nursing disciplines through identification of the former with individual treatment and of the latter with the patient groups. An unproductive loss of common treatment goals was the result leading to a near closing down of the clinic. Putting medical and nursing personnel into one team, responsible for the entire treatment of the unit, restored productivity and improved treatment and the working climate.

精神病学临床实践中的责任分离原则。6年工作经验。
描述了一项持续6年的实验,该实验采用了一种名为“分离责任”的组织原则。其目的是通过两个多学科治疗小组划分权力,即对单个患者和作为一个群体的患者负责,促进急性精神病住院诊所的开放双向交流。然而,由于不同的原因,多学科被证明是不可能维持的。相反,通过将前者与个体治疗相区分,将后者与患者群体相区分,医学和护理学科发生了分裂。共同治疗目标的无效损失导致诊所几乎关闭。将医疗和护理人员组成一个小组,负责整个单位的治疗,恢复了生产力,改善了治疗和工作气氛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书