Detection of carotid artery stenosis and obstruction by cerebral radionuclide angiography.

Progress in nuclear medicine Pub Date : 1981-01-01
O Juge
{"title":"Detection of carotid artery stenosis and obstruction by cerebral radionuclide angiography.","authors":"O Juge","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CA and RA were performed in 140 patients suffering either from TIAs (n = 43; mean age 59 +/- 9.7 years) or from RIND (n = 97; mean age 58 +/- 13 years). Completed stroke was excluded from this study. Criteria of abnormality of RA were determined from a normal control group (n = 100; mean age 37 +/- 17 years). Overall detection rate of extracranial carotid artery lesions of any size was 63% (42:66). False negative results were reviewed. Within the same group of patients, DU was positive in 76%. The addition of RA and DU enhanced the detection rate to 88%. In the subgroup with normal extracranial carotid arteries, RA accounted for 6.7% of false positive results. Intracranially, RA was able to demonstrate a significant asymmetry of perfusion in good correlation with clinical examination in 65% of the cases (91: 140), whereas CA was found positive in only 26% of the patients. It is concluded that RA is best suited for documentation of intracranial carotid artery territory disease and for studying intracranial consequences of extracranial lesions. In contrast, DU is preferred for detection of extracranial lesions. However, the addition of both techniques enhances the power of non-invasive detection of carotid artery stenosis and obstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":76376,"journal":{"name":"Progress in nuclear medicine","volume":"7 ","pages":"30-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CA and RA were performed in 140 patients suffering either from TIAs (n = 43; mean age 59 +/- 9.7 years) or from RIND (n = 97; mean age 58 +/- 13 years). Completed stroke was excluded from this study. Criteria of abnormality of RA were determined from a normal control group (n = 100; mean age 37 +/- 17 years). Overall detection rate of extracranial carotid artery lesions of any size was 63% (42:66). False negative results were reviewed. Within the same group of patients, DU was positive in 76%. The addition of RA and DU enhanced the detection rate to 88%. In the subgroup with normal extracranial carotid arteries, RA accounted for 6.7% of false positive results. Intracranially, RA was able to demonstrate a significant asymmetry of perfusion in good correlation with clinical examination in 65% of the cases (91: 140), whereas CA was found positive in only 26% of the patients. It is concluded that RA is best suited for documentation of intracranial carotid artery territory disease and for studying intracranial consequences of extracranial lesions. In contrast, DU is preferred for detection of extracranial lesions. However, the addition of both techniques enhances the power of non-invasive detection of carotid artery stenosis and obstruction.

脑核素血管造影检测颈动脉狭窄和梗阻。
140例tia患者分别行CA和RA (n = 43;平均年龄59±9.7岁)或来自RIND (n = 97;平均年龄58±13岁)。完全中风被排除在本研究之外。从正常对照组(n = 100;平均年龄37±17岁)。颅外颈动脉病变的总检出率为63%(42:66)。对假阴性结果进行回顾。在同一组患者中,76%的DU为阳性。RA和DU的加入使检出率提高到88%。在颅外颈动脉正常亚组中,RA占假阳性结果的6.7%。在颅内,65%的病例(91:140)显示RA灌注明显不对称,与临床检查有良好的相关性,而CA仅在26%的患者中呈阳性。结论RA最适合颅内颈动脉区域疾病的记录和研究颅外病变的颅内后果。相比之下,DU是检测颅外病变的首选。然而,这两种技术的结合提高了颈动脉狭窄和阻塞的无创检测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信