An analysis of social perceptions of epilepsy: Increasing rationalization as seen through the theories of Comte and Weber

Judith L. Pasternak
{"title":"An analysis of social perceptions of epilepsy: Increasing rationalization as seen through the theories of Comte and Weber","authors":"Judith L. Pasternak","doi":"10.1016/0271-5384(81)90017-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper analyzes social ideas and prejudices surrounding epilepsy in terms of the theories of two major sociologists: Auguste Comte and Max Weber.</p><p>Social conceptions of epilepsy are analyzed in terms of Comte's thesis of the 3 stages of Western culture's interpretation of natural phenomena—a progression from a religious or superstitious method of explaining nature to a naturalistic model of social and physical reality and finally to a scientific model. Changing social conceptions of epilepsy, with their attending prejudices followed such a progression.</p><p>This paper follows the transition from the exclusion of epileptics from the cultural life of their people in classical Greece, Rome and the ancient Middle East as demon-possessed, or ritually banned outcasts, to the medieval view of epilepsy as a natural, but a fearful disorder, still surrounded by superstition and beliefs that the epileptic was to be avoided, to the modern, scientific view of epilepsy as a disorder of the brain. Prejudices have been ameliorated, but not eliminated, by this transition: in the modern clinical picture the epileptic, if not ‘possessed’, is still ‘sick’ and therefore barred from various activities and interactions in his society.</p><p>Weber's thesis, the core of which is that the Protestant work ethic, with its rationalistic values of deligence, efficiency and rational, goal-directed behavior was an important factor in the development of capitalistic economics in Western cultures is employed here to explain prejudices against epileptics, especially in the form of job discrimination in industrial societies. Because his disorder may prevent him from obtaining maximum efficiency (or because his disorder is <em>believed</em> to preclude maximum efficiency) the epileptic may find it difficult to hold his own in industrial societies.</p><p>This paper elucidates the way in which these general social theories impinge upon the treatment of epileptics in society in an attempt to better understand the obstacles which these individuals face on the way to full participation in the life of their society.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79264,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part E, Medical psychology","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 223-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-5384(81)90017-X","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science & medicine. Part E, Medical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/027153848190017X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

This paper analyzes social ideas and prejudices surrounding epilepsy in terms of the theories of two major sociologists: Auguste Comte and Max Weber.

Social conceptions of epilepsy are analyzed in terms of Comte's thesis of the 3 stages of Western culture's interpretation of natural phenomena—a progression from a religious or superstitious method of explaining nature to a naturalistic model of social and physical reality and finally to a scientific model. Changing social conceptions of epilepsy, with their attending prejudices followed such a progression.

This paper follows the transition from the exclusion of epileptics from the cultural life of their people in classical Greece, Rome and the ancient Middle East as demon-possessed, or ritually banned outcasts, to the medieval view of epilepsy as a natural, but a fearful disorder, still surrounded by superstition and beliefs that the epileptic was to be avoided, to the modern, scientific view of epilepsy as a disorder of the brain. Prejudices have been ameliorated, but not eliminated, by this transition: in the modern clinical picture the epileptic, if not ‘possessed’, is still ‘sick’ and therefore barred from various activities and interactions in his society.

Weber's thesis, the core of which is that the Protestant work ethic, with its rationalistic values of deligence, efficiency and rational, goal-directed behavior was an important factor in the development of capitalistic economics in Western cultures is employed here to explain prejudices against epileptics, especially in the form of job discrimination in industrial societies. Because his disorder may prevent him from obtaining maximum efficiency (or because his disorder is believed to preclude maximum efficiency) the epileptic may find it difficult to hold his own in industrial societies.

This paper elucidates the way in which these general social theories impinge upon the treatment of epileptics in society in an attempt to better understand the obstacles which these individuals face on the way to full participation in the life of their society.

对癫痫的社会观念的分析:通过孔德和韦伯的理论看到的日益合理化
本文从两大社会学家奥古斯特·孔德和马克斯·韦伯的理论出发,分析了围绕癫痫的社会观念和偏见。根据孔德关于西方文化对自然现象解释的三个阶段——从解释自然的宗教或迷信方法到社会和物理现实的自然主义模式,最后到科学模式——的论点,对癫痫的社会概念进行了分析。社会对癫痫病观念的改变以及随之而来的偏见也是如此。本文遵循了从古典希腊、罗马和古代中东将癫痫患者排除在其人民的文化生活之外,将其视为恶魔附体,或在仪式上被禁止的弃世者,到中世纪将癫痫视为一种自然但可怕的疾病,仍然被避免癫痫的迷信和信仰所包围,再到现代将癫痫视为一种大脑疾病的科学观点的转变。通过这种转变,偏见得到了改善,但并没有消除:在现代临床图景中,癫痫患者即使没有“被附体”,也仍然是“有病”,因此被禁止在他的社会中进行各种活动和互动。韦伯的论点,其核心是新教的工作伦理,其勤奋,效率和理性,目标导向的行为的理性主义价值观是西方文化中资本主义经济学发展的重要因素,在这里被用来解释对癫痫患者的偏见,特别是工业社会中工作歧视的形式。因为癫痫病患者可能会妨碍他获得最大的工作效率(或者因为人们认为他的疾病会妨碍最大的工作效率),他可能会发现自己很难在工业社会中立足。本文阐明了这些一般的社会理论如何影响癫痫患者在社会中的治疗,试图更好地理解这些个体在充分参与社会生活的道路上所面临的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信