{"title":"[The epidemiology of asthma in Lorraine. A method of Study (author's transl)].","authors":"J P Monneau, J P Grilliat, B Haas, R Guegen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors undertook an epidemiological study to held useful criteria to identify asthma sufferers. A simple questionnaire was used asking three questions: - Do you wheeze on breathing? - Do you have attacks of breathlessness during the night? - Do you have asthma? 7,904 people were questioned at the Centre for Preventive Medicine at Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy over a year and 1,062 gave a positive response to at least one question. The replies were sub-divided into 5 groups according to the pattern of response and were then given a further clinical assessment as follows: - A sensitivity test for house dust allergy; - A bronchial sensitivity test to Acetylcholine; - The level of blood eosinophilia; - Presence or absence of a family history of asthma. The results were then compared to a matched group of controls who gave a negative reply to all three questions. The authors concluded that the term asthma should only be used by people who recognize themselves as asthmatics and can identify at least one trigger factor in their symptoms. One frequently finds in such people : a family history of asthma, a positive allergy test to the house dust mite, and eosinophilia. On the other hand those with only one or two symptoms (dyspnoea or wheezing) without recognizing themselves as asthmatics had little evidence of a family history of asthma, a sensitivity to the house dust mite comparable to controls and no eosinophilia; in these people there was a striking relationship to tobacco consumption. The Acetylcholine test shows little discriminative value in an epidemiological study of this nature; asthmatics could not be separated from patients with chronic air-flow obstruction, particularly when due to tobacco. It would be helpful to find a test of bronchial hyperactivity which could be used epidemiology. As a result of this study it is possibly to place the prevalence of asthma in the South of Lorraine in the range of 1.7 to 3.6% of the population.</p>","PeriodicalId":76480,"journal":{"name":"Revue francaise des maladies respiratoires","volume":"9 5","pages":"381-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue francaise des maladies respiratoires","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The authors undertook an epidemiological study to held useful criteria to identify asthma sufferers. A simple questionnaire was used asking three questions: - Do you wheeze on breathing? - Do you have attacks of breathlessness during the night? - Do you have asthma? 7,904 people were questioned at the Centre for Preventive Medicine at Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy over a year and 1,062 gave a positive response to at least one question. The replies were sub-divided into 5 groups according to the pattern of response and were then given a further clinical assessment as follows: - A sensitivity test for house dust allergy; - A bronchial sensitivity test to Acetylcholine; - The level of blood eosinophilia; - Presence or absence of a family history of asthma. The results were then compared to a matched group of controls who gave a negative reply to all three questions. The authors concluded that the term asthma should only be used by people who recognize themselves as asthmatics and can identify at least one trigger factor in their symptoms. One frequently finds in such people : a family history of asthma, a positive allergy test to the house dust mite, and eosinophilia. On the other hand those with only one or two symptoms (dyspnoea or wheezing) without recognizing themselves as asthmatics had little evidence of a family history of asthma, a sensitivity to the house dust mite comparable to controls and no eosinophilia; in these people there was a striking relationship to tobacco consumption. The Acetylcholine test shows little discriminative value in an epidemiological study of this nature; asthmatics could not be separated from patients with chronic air-flow obstruction, particularly when due to tobacco. It would be helpful to find a test of bronchial hyperactivity which could be used epidemiology. As a result of this study it is possibly to place the prevalence of asthma in the South of Lorraine in the range of 1.7 to 3.6% of the population.