[The epidemiology of asthma in Lorraine. A method of Study (author's transl)].

J P Monneau, J P Grilliat, B Haas, R Guegen
{"title":"[The epidemiology of asthma in Lorraine. A method of Study (author's transl)].","authors":"J P Monneau,&nbsp;J P Grilliat,&nbsp;B Haas,&nbsp;R Guegen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors undertook an epidemiological study to held useful criteria to identify asthma sufferers. A simple questionnaire was used asking three questions: - Do you wheeze on breathing? - Do you have attacks of breathlessness during the night? - Do you have asthma? 7,904 people were questioned at the Centre for Preventive Medicine at Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy over a year and 1,062 gave a positive response to at least one question. The replies were sub-divided into 5 groups according to the pattern of response and were then given a further clinical assessment as follows: - A sensitivity test for house dust allergy; - A bronchial sensitivity test to Acetylcholine; - The level of blood eosinophilia; - Presence or absence of a family history of asthma. The results were then compared to a matched group of controls who gave a negative reply to all three questions. The authors concluded that the term asthma should only be used by people who recognize themselves as asthmatics and can identify at least one trigger factor in their symptoms. One frequently finds in such people : a family history of asthma, a positive allergy test to the house dust mite, and eosinophilia. On the other hand those with only one or two symptoms (dyspnoea or wheezing) without recognizing themselves as asthmatics had little evidence of a family history of asthma, a sensitivity to the house dust mite comparable to controls and no eosinophilia; in these people there was a striking relationship to tobacco consumption. The Acetylcholine test shows little discriminative value in an epidemiological study of this nature; asthmatics could not be separated from patients with chronic air-flow obstruction, particularly when due to tobacco. It would be helpful to find a test of bronchial hyperactivity which could be used epidemiology. As a result of this study it is possibly to place the prevalence of asthma in the South of Lorraine in the range of 1.7 to 3.6% of the population.</p>","PeriodicalId":76480,"journal":{"name":"Revue francaise des maladies respiratoires","volume":"9 5","pages":"381-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue francaise des maladies respiratoires","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors undertook an epidemiological study to held useful criteria to identify asthma sufferers. A simple questionnaire was used asking three questions: - Do you wheeze on breathing? - Do you have attacks of breathlessness during the night? - Do you have asthma? 7,904 people were questioned at the Centre for Preventive Medicine at Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy over a year and 1,062 gave a positive response to at least one question. The replies were sub-divided into 5 groups according to the pattern of response and were then given a further clinical assessment as follows: - A sensitivity test for house dust allergy; - A bronchial sensitivity test to Acetylcholine; - The level of blood eosinophilia; - Presence or absence of a family history of asthma. The results were then compared to a matched group of controls who gave a negative reply to all three questions. The authors concluded that the term asthma should only be used by people who recognize themselves as asthmatics and can identify at least one trigger factor in their symptoms. One frequently finds in such people : a family history of asthma, a positive allergy test to the house dust mite, and eosinophilia. On the other hand those with only one or two symptoms (dyspnoea or wheezing) without recognizing themselves as asthmatics had little evidence of a family history of asthma, a sensitivity to the house dust mite comparable to controls and no eosinophilia; in these people there was a striking relationship to tobacco consumption. The Acetylcholine test shows little discriminative value in an epidemiological study of this nature; asthmatics could not be separated from patients with chronic air-flow obstruction, particularly when due to tobacco. It would be helpful to find a test of bronchial hyperactivity which could be used epidemiology. As a result of this study it is possibly to place the prevalence of asthma in the South of Lorraine in the range of 1.7 to 3.6% of the population.

洛林市哮喘流行病学研究。一种研究方法[作者的翻译]。
作者进行了一项流行病学研究,以确定哮喘患者的有用标准。使用了一个简单的调查问卷,问三个问题:-你呼吸时有喘息吗?-你晚上会有呼吸困难吗?-你有哮喘吗?在Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy的预防医学中心,7904人在一年的时间里接受了调查,其中1062人对至少一个问题给出了肯定的回答。根据反应模式将应答者再分为5组,然后进行进一步的临床评估如下:-室内粉尘过敏敏感性测试;-乙酰胆碱支气管敏感性试验;-血嗜酸性粒细胞水平;-是否有哮喘家族史。然后将结果与对所有三个问题都给出否定回答的对照组进行比较。作者的结论是,只有那些认为自己是哮喘患者,并能在症状中识别出至少一个触发因素的人,才应该使用“哮喘”一词。在这样的人群中经常发现:有哮喘家族史,屋尘螨过敏试验阳性,嗜酸性粒细胞增多。另一方面,那些只有一种或两种症状(呼吸困难或喘息)而不认为自己是哮喘患者的人,几乎没有哮喘家族史的证据,对室内尘螨的敏感性与对照组相当,没有嗜酸性粒细胞;这些人与烟草消费有着惊人的关系。在这种性质的流行病学研究中,乙酰胆碱试验没有什么鉴别价值;哮喘患者不能与慢性气流阻塞患者分开,特别是由于烟草引起的。寻找一种可用于流行病学的支气管多动性检查方法。这项研究的结果可能是,洛林南部的哮喘患病率在总人口的1.7 - 3.6%之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信