Optimization of radiotherapy. Some notes on the principles and practice of optimization in cancer treatment and implications for clinical research.

Cancer clinical trials Pub Date : 1981-01-01
J R Andrews
{"title":"Optimization of radiotherapy. Some notes on the principles and practice of optimization in cancer treatment and implications for clinical research.","authors":"J R Andrews","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two methods dominate cancer treatment--one, the traditional best practice, individualized treatment method and two, the a priori determined decision method of the interinstitutional, cooperative, clinical trial. In the first, choices are infinite and can be made at the time of treatment; in the second, choices are finite and are made in advance of treatment on a random basis. Neither method systematically selects, identifies, or formalizes the optimum level of effect in the treatment chosen. Of the two, it can be argued that the first, other things being equal, is more likely to select the optimum treatment. The determination of level of effect for the optimization of cancer treatment requires the generation of dose-response relationships for both benefit and risk and the introduction of benefit and risk considerations and judgements. The clinical trial, as presently constituted, doses not yield this kind of information, it being, generally, of the binary yes or no, better or worse type. The best practice, individualized treatment method can yield, when adequately documented, both a range of dose-response relationships and a variety of benefit and risk considerations. The presentation will be limited to a consideration of a single modality of cancer treatment, radiation therapy, but an analogy with other modalities of cancer treatment will be inferred. Criteria for optimization will be developed and graphic means for its identification and formalization will be demonstrated with examples taken from the radiotherapy literature. The general problem of optimization theory and practice will be discussed; the necessity for its exploration in relation to the increasing complexity of cancer treatment will be developed; and recommendations for clinical research will be made including a proposal for the support of clinics as an alternative to the support of programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":75672,"journal":{"name":"Cancer clinical trials","volume":"4 4","pages":"483-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two methods dominate cancer treatment--one, the traditional best practice, individualized treatment method and two, the a priori determined decision method of the interinstitutional, cooperative, clinical trial. In the first, choices are infinite and can be made at the time of treatment; in the second, choices are finite and are made in advance of treatment on a random basis. Neither method systematically selects, identifies, or formalizes the optimum level of effect in the treatment chosen. Of the two, it can be argued that the first, other things being equal, is more likely to select the optimum treatment. The determination of level of effect for the optimization of cancer treatment requires the generation of dose-response relationships for both benefit and risk and the introduction of benefit and risk considerations and judgements. The clinical trial, as presently constituted, doses not yield this kind of information, it being, generally, of the binary yes or no, better or worse type. The best practice, individualized treatment method can yield, when adequately documented, both a range of dose-response relationships and a variety of benefit and risk considerations. The presentation will be limited to a consideration of a single modality of cancer treatment, radiation therapy, but an analogy with other modalities of cancer treatment will be inferred. Criteria for optimization will be developed and graphic means for its identification and formalization will be demonstrated with examples taken from the radiotherapy literature. The general problem of optimization theory and practice will be discussed; the necessity for its exploration in relation to the increasing complexity of cancer treatment will be developed; and recommendations for clinical research will be made including a proposal for the support of clinics as an alternative to the support of programs.

放疗优化。关于肿瘤治疗最优化的原则和实践及其对临床研究的启示。
两种方法主导着癌症治疗——一种是传统的最佳实践、个体化治疗方法,另一种是机构间合作、临床试验的先验确定决策方法。在第一种情况下,选择是无限的,可以在治疗时做出;在第二种情况下,选择是有限的,并且是在随机的基础上提前做出的。两种方法都没有系统地选择、确定或形式化所选治疗的最佳效果水平。在这两者中,可以认为,在其他条件相同的情况下,前者更有可能选择最佳治疗方法。确定最佳癌症治疗的效果水平需要建立获益和风险的剂量-反应关系,并引入获益和风险考虑和判断。临床试验,目前构成,剂量不能产生这种信息,它通常是二元的是或否,更好或更坏的类型。在充分记录的情况下,最佳实践,个体化治疗方法可以产生一系列剂量-反应关系以及各种获益和风险考虑。本报告将仅限于考虑癌症治疗的单一模式,放射治疗,但将推断与其他癌症治疗模式的类比。优化的标准将被开发,其识别和形式化的图形手段将用放射治疗文献中的例子来演示。讨论了优化理论与实践中的一般问题;随着癌症治疗的日益复杂,对其进行探索的必要性将得到发展;对临床研究的建议将包括支持诊所作为项目支持的替代方案的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书