Clinical trials:randomization before consent.

P W Armstrong, D G Watts
{"title":"Clinical trials:randomization before consent.","authors":"P W Armstrong,&nbsp;D G Watts","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conventional blind randomized trials involve obtaining consent for treatment prior to randomization into control or treatment groups. When the trial is of necessity an open one, obtaining consent to treatment and then assigning the patient to a control group may lead to undesirable consequences. When consent is required prior to randomization, inability to obtain it diminishes both control and treatment numbers. Obtaining consent after randomization enhances the power of the study since refusal affects only treatment numbers thus making more efficient use of patient material. We propose to analyze the outcome of patients allocated to treatment, but refusing experimental therapy, as a separate group. Comparison of this group with the control population will permit validation of the efficacy of the randomization process and allow testing of the hypothesis that refusers of consent react the same as the control population. If no difference occurs we propose that the refuser and control groups be combined and compared with those patients who receive experimental treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9217,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine / [publiee pour l'A.A.I.C.I.G.]","volume":"34 2","pages":"65-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine / [publiee pour l'A.A.I.C.I.G.]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional blind randomized trials involve obtaining consent for treatment prior to randomization into control or treatment groups. When the trial is of necessity an open one, obtaining consent to treatment and then assigning the patient to a control group may lead to undesirable consequences. When consent is required prior to randomization, inability to obtain it diminishes both control and treatment numbers. Obtaining consent after randomization enhances the power of the study since refusal affects only treatment numbers thus making more efficient use of patient material. We propose to analyze the outcome of patients allocated to treatment, but refusing experimental therapy, as a separate group. Comparison of this group with the control population will permit validation of the efficacy of the randomization process and allow testing of the hypothesis that refusers of consent react the same as the control population. If no difference occurs we propose that the refuser and control groups be combined and compared with those patients who receive experimental treatment.

临床试验:同意前随机化。
传统的盲随机试验包括在随机分配到对照组或治疗组之前获得治疗同意。当试验必须是公开的时,获得治疗的同意,然后将患者分配到对照组可能会导致不良后果。当在随机化之前需要同意时,无法获得同意会减少对照和治疗的数量。在随机化后获得同意增强了研究的力量,因为拒绝只影响治疗数量,从而更有效地利用患者材料。我们建议将接受治疗但拒绝实验性治疗的患者作为单独的组进行分析。将这一组与对照人群进行比较,将允许验证随机化过程的有效性,并允许测试拒绝同意者的反应与对照人群相同的假设。如果没有发生差异,我们建议将拒绝组和对照组与接受实验治疗的患者合并进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信