[Intervention among patients with right bundle branch block and left anterior hemiblock. Operatory risk (author's transl)].

Anesthesie, analgesie, reanimation Pub Date : 1981-01-01
P Coriat, A Harari, J P Tarot, A Ducardonnet, P Viars
{"title":"[Intervention among patients with right bundle branch block and left anterior hemiblock. Operatory risk (author's transl)].","authors":"P Coriat,&nbsp;A Harari,&nbsp;J P Tarot,&nbsp;A Ducardonnet,&nbsp;P Viars","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to assess the risk of advanced heart block during anesthesia in patients with right bundle branch block and left anterior hemiblock, 35 consecutive patients were monitored throughout the pre-, intra- and postoperative period. As conventional ECG monitoring may only detect advanced atrioventricular block, patients were monitored according to the Holter method which can easily detect even minor changes of atrioventricular conduction namely slight increased PR interval or dropped P wave. All patients were asymptomatic, in normal sinus rhythm without second degree AV block. Surgical procedures were performed under general anesthesia (n = 15) and epidural anesthesia using lidocaine (n = 20). No episode of second or third degree atrioventricular block occurred. The only modifications observed were rare and transient increase of PR, occurring during surgical procedures in 5 patients, always associated with a sinus bradycardia. They immediately regressed at the termination of the sinus bradycardia either spontaneously or following atropine injection, strongly suggesting the responsability of increased vagal tone. Thus general or epidural anesthesia did not compromise infranodal conduction in any of the observed patients. These data indicate that anesthesia can be safely used without prophylactic preoperative insertion of pacemakers in patients with asymptomatic chronic right bundle branch block and left anterior hemi-block.</p>","PeriodicalId":7785,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesie, analgesie, reanimation","volume":"38 3-4","pages":"125-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesie, analgesie, reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to assess the risk of advanced heart block during anesthesia in patients with right bundle branch block and left anterior hemiblock, 35 consecutive patients were monitored throughout the pre-, intra- and postoperative period. As conventional ECG monitoring may only detect advanced atrioventricular block, patients were monitored according to the Holter method which can easily detect even minor changes of atrioventricular conduction namely slight increased PR interval or dropped P wave. All patients were asymptomatic, in normal sinus rhythm without second degree AV block. Surgical procedures were performed under general anesthesia (n = 15) and epidural anesthesia using lidocaine (n = 20). No episode of second or third degree atrioventricular block occurred. The only modifications observed were rare and transient increase of PR, occurring during surgical procedures in 5 patients, always associated with a sinus bradycardia. They immediately regressed at the termination of the sinus bradycardia either spontaneously or following atropine injection, strongly suggesting the responsability of increased vagal tone. Thus general or epidural anesthesia did not compromise infranodal conduction in any of the observed patients. These data indicate that anesthesia can be safely used without prophylactic preoperative insertion of pacemakers in patients with asymptomatic chronic right bundle branch block and left anterior hemi-block.

右束支阻滞和左前半部分阻滞患者的干预。手术风险(作者陈述)。
为了评估右束支阻滞和左前半部阻滞患者麻醉期间发生晚期心脏传导阻滞的风险,我们连续监测了35例患者的术前、术中和术后情况。由于常规心电监测只能检测到晚期房室传导阻滞,因此采用Holter法监测患者,可以很容易地检测到房室传导的微小变化,即PR间期的轻微增加或P波的下降。所有患者无症状,窦性心律正常,无二度房室传导阻滞。手术在全麻(n = 15)和利多卡因硬膜外麻醉(n = 20)下进行。未发生二度或三度房室传导阻滞。唯一观察到的变化是罕见的和短暂的PR增加,发生在5例患者的手术过程中,总是与窦性心动过缓有关。它们在窦性心动过缓终止时立即消退,无论是自发的还是注射阿托品后,强烈提示迷走神经张力增加的原因。因此,在任何观察到的患者中,全身麻醉或硬膜外麻醉都不会损害肠内传导。这些数据表明,对于无症状的慢性右束支阻滞和左前半阻滞患者,麻醉可以安全使用,无需预防性的术前植入起搏器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信