[Staged bronchial biopsies in the preoperative evaluation of primary bronchial cancer].

Y Echard, A Barre, M Jagueux, J P Derenne, G Decroix
{"title":"[Staged bronchial biopsies in the preoperative evaluation of primary bronchial cancer].","authors":"Y Echard,&nbsp;A Barre,&nbsp;M Jagueux,&nbsp;J P Derenne,&nbsp;G Decroix","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The systematic biopsying of the carina overlying a tumour, the main carina and of a contralateral carina was made a part of the work up in some patients with bronchial carcinoma, to assess operability. Different studies show that despite a normal macroscopic appearance these biopsies often reveal sub-mucous invasion. This microscopic extension might modify the resection planned, and even end in inoperability in the case of tracheal or contralateral tracheal invasion. We have studied the notes of 110 patients with primary bronchial carcinoma who have had systematic biopsies. All had a normal endoscopic appearance in the carinas biopsied and none revealed invasion by tumour. Of 110 patients, 37 had operations. In 1/3 (13/37) there was a discordance between the pre-operative bronchoscopic assessment and the local extension at thoracotomy, since 7 patients were subjected to a more extensive dissection than planned, 4 were exploratory thoracotomies only and in 4 the bronchial stumps were found to be invaded. Thus negative biopsies of healthy carinas overlying a tumour have proved to be false security and did not allow us to confirm the absence of tumour extension at peri-bronchial level in the local lymph nodes or in the mediastinum.</p>","PeriodicalId":76480,"journal":{"name":"Revue francaise des maladies respiratoires","volume":"10 5","pages":"345-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue francaise des maladies respiratoires","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The systematic biopsying of the carina overlying a tumour, the main carina and of a contralateral carina was made a part of the work up in some patients with bronchial carcinoma, to assess operability. Different studies show that despite a normal macroscopic appearance these biopsies often reveal sub-mucous invasion. This microscopic extension might modify the resection planned, and even end in inoperability in the case of tracheal or contralateral tracheal invasion. We have studied the notes of 110 patients with primary bronchial carcinoma who have had systematic biopsies. All had a normal endoscopic appearance in the carinas biopsied and none revealed invasion by tumour. Of 110 patients, 37 had operations. In 1/3 (13/37) there was a discordance between the pre-operative bronchoscopic assessment and the local extension at thoracotomy, since 7 patients were subjected to a more extensive dissection than planned, 4 were exploratory thoracotomies only and in 4 the bronchial stumps were found to be invaded. Thus negative biopsies of healthy carinas overlying a tumour have proved to be false security and did not allow us to confirm the absence of tumour extension at peri-bronchial level in the local lymph nodes or in the mediastinum.

[分期支气管活检在原发性支气管癌术前评估中的应用]。
系统活检肿瘤上的隆突、主隆突和对侧隆突是一些支气管癌患者工作的一部分,以评估可操作性。不同的研究表明,尽管肉眼表现正常,这些活组织检查经常显示粘膜下浸润。这种显微延伸可能会改变切除计划,甚至在气管或对侧气管侵犯的情况下无法手术。我们研究了110例行系统活检的原发性支气管癌患者的记录。所有的隆突活检的内窥镜外观正常,没有发现肿瘤侵袭。在110名患者中,37人接受了手术。1/3(13/37)的患者术前支气管镜评估与开胸时局部伸展不一致,因为7例患者进行了比计划更广泛的剥离,4例患者仅进行了探查性开胸,4例患者发现支气管残端被侵犯。因此,肿瘤上健康隆突的阴性活组织检查被证明是错误的安全性,并且不能使我们确认肿瘤在局部淋巴结或纵隔的支气管周围水平没有扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书