[Vacuum extraction in modern obstetrics].

P Draca, L Nikolić, M Maticki
{"title":"[Vacuum extraction in modern obstetrics].","authors":"P Draca,&nbsp;L Nikolić,&nbsp;M Maticki","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>From 1970 to 1979 the authors analysed 1721 vacuum extractions. The method was introduced into the Department in 1965 and performed in 0.96% of cases. From 1970 to 1980 the use of VE increased from 1.97% to 4.93%. The most frequent indication for its use was the prolonged expulsion phase (49.78%). While in premature children the method was applied rarely (2.32%), in children weighing over 4000 g it was indicated in 16.44% of cases. The newborns delivered by VE proved to have increased traumatic morbidity rates (anoxia perinatalis 25.56%, haemorrhagia intracranialis 20.39%, cephalhaematoma 33.58%). The mortality of newborns delivered by VE amounted to 6.39%. There was 1.10% of unsuccessful vacuum extractions (19 parturients: in 16 forceps and in 3 cesarean section were applied). In the authors' opinion, vacuum extraction is the method of choice in the vaginal operative completion of labour: VE does not diminish the pelvic cavity or fix the position of the head of the fetus but allows the flexion of the head by natural forces. After each unsuccessful vacuum extraction it is necessary to examine its causes. The choice of the method for completing labour depends on the obstetric situation. Intracranial hemorrhages amounting to 20.39% warn the authors to reexamine the methods of their work.</p>","PeriodicalId":76065,"journal":{"name":"Jugoslavenska ginekologija i opstetricija","volume":"22 5-6","pages":"124-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jugoslavenska ginekologija i opstetricija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From 1970 to 1979 the authors analysed 1721 vacuum extractions. The method was introduced into the Department in 1965 and performed in 0.96% of cases. From 1970 to 1980 the use of VE increased from 1.97% to 4.93%. The most frequent indication for its use was the prolonged expulsion phase (49.78%). While in premature children the method was applied rarely (2.32%), in children weighing over 4000 g it was indicated in 16.44% of cases. The newborns delivered by VE proved to have increased traumatic morbidity rates (anoxia perinatalis 25.56%, haemorrhagia intracranialis 20.39%, cephalhaematoma 33.58%). The mortality of newborns delivered by VE amounted to 6.39%. There was 1.10% of unsuccessful vacuum extractions (19 parturients: in 16 forceps and in 3 cesarean section were applied). In the authors' opinion, vacuum extraction is the method of choice in the vaginal operative completion of labour: VE does not diminish the pelvic cavity or fix the position of the head of the fetus but allows the flexion of the head by natural forces. After each unsuccessful vacuum extraction it is necessary to examine its causes. The choice of the method for completing labour depends on the obstetric situation. Intracranial hemorrhages amounting to 20.39% warn the authors to reexamine the methods of their work.

[现代产科的真空抽吸]。
从1970年到1979年,作者分析了1721次真空抽提。该方法于1965年引入该科,0.96%的病例采用该方法。从1970年到1980年,VE的使用率从1.97%上升到4.93%。最常见的适应症是排出期延长(49.78%)。早产儿很少采用该方法(2.32%),而体重超过4000 g的儿童采用该方法的比例为16.44%。经VE分娩的新生儿创伤性发病率增高(围产儿缺氧25.56%,颅内出血20.39%,脑血肿33.58%)。经静脉注射分娩的新生儿死亡率为6.39%。抽吸不成功的占1.10%(19例,16钳,3剖宫产)。在作者看来,真空抽吸是阴道手术完成分娩的首选方法:真空抽吸不会缩小盆腔或固定胎儿头部的位置,而是允许头部在自然力的作用下屈曲。每次抽真空失败后,有必要检查其原因。完成分娩方法的选择取决于产科情况。颅内出血占20.39%,提醒作者重新审视工作方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书