Experimental characterization of the difference in induction period between CH4 and CO2 hydrates: Motivations and possible consequences on the replacement process

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Alberto Maria Gambelli, Federico Rossi
{"title":"Experimental characterization of the difference in induction period between CH4 and CO2 hydrates: Motivations and possible consequences on the replacement process","authors":"Alberto Maria Gambelli,&nbsp;Federico Rossi","doi":"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The present research explores the differences in induction time between methane and carbon dioxide hydrates. This parameter was calculated by considering the heat released during the formation of hydrates. Being the process exothermic, the heat released, in conjunction with the enthalpy of formation, allowed to calculate the quantity of hydrates formed as soon as the process became detectable. This information was then combined with the measure of time to define the induction period. The procedure was selected in order to avoid possible errors related to the dissolution of carbon dioxide in water, which may affect the accuracy of detection. It was found that the induction time is significantly longer for carbon dioxide hydrates. It can be explained with the non-hydrophobicity of the molecule and with the higher Gibbs free energy barrier which must be overcome to produce the first nuclei of CO</span><sub>2</sub><span> hydrates. The reliability of the proposed method was verified by evaluating the gas absorption over time for methane, whose dissolution in water can be considered negligible. Finally, it was proved that, after the formation of the first conglomerates, the growth of carbon dioxide hydrates is faster than that of methane hydrates, due to the higher degree of mixing between water and gas molecules within the whole formation environment.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 104848"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022004346","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The present research explores the differences in induction time between methane and carbon dioxide hydrates. This parameter was calculated by considering the heat released during the formation of hydrates. Being the process exothermic, the heat released, in conjunction with the enthalpy of formation, allowed to calculate the quantity of hydrates formed as soon as the process became detectable. This information was then combined with the measure of time to define the induction period. The procedure was selected in order to avoid possible errors related to the dissolution of carbon dioxide in water, which may affect the accuracy of detection. It was found that the induction time is significantly longer for carbon dioxide hydrates. It can be explained with the non-hydrophobicity of the molecule and with the higher Gibbs free energy barrier which must be overcome to produce the first nuclei of CO2 hydrates. The reliability of the proposed method was verified by evaluating the gas absorption over time for methane, whose dissolution in water can be considered negligible. Finally, it was proved that, after the formation of the first conglomerates, the growth of carbon dioxide hydrates is faster than that of methane hydrates, due to the higher degree of mixing between water and gas molecules within the whole formation environment.

Abstract Image

CH4和CO2水合物诱导期差异的实验表征:对替代过程的动机和可能后果
本研究探讨了甲烷和二氧化碳水合物在诱导时间上的差异。该参数是通过考虑水合物形成过程中释放的热量来计算的。由于这一过程是放热的,因此释放的热量与生成焓相结合,就可以计算出在这一过程被检测到时形成的水合物的数量。然后将这些信息与时间测量相结合来确定诱导期。选择该方法是为了避免二氧化碳在水中溶解可能产生的误差,这可能会影响检测的准确性。结果表明,二氧化碳水合物的诱导时间明显延长。这可以用分子的非疏水性和必须克服更高的吉布斯自由能垒来解释,这是产生二氧化碳水合物的第一个核所必须克服的。通过评估甲烷随时间的气体吸收来验证所提出方法的可靠性,甲烷在水中的溶解可以忽略不计。最后证明,在第一批砾岩形成后,由于整个地层环境中水与气分子的混合程度更高,二氧化碳水合物的生长速度要快于甲烷水合物的生长速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering ENERGY & FUELS-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering and the science of natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of natural gas science and engineering from the reservoir to the market. An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering covers the fields of natural gas exploration, production, processing and transmission in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of natural gas; natural gas geochemistry; gas-reservoir engineering; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced gas recovery; thermodynamics and phase behaviour, gas-reservoir modelling and simulation; natural gas production engineering; primary and enhanced production from unconventional gas resources, subsurface issues related to coalbed methane, tight gas, shale gas, and hydrate production, formation evaluation; exploration methods, multiphase flow and flow assurance issues, novel processing (e.g., subsea) techniques, raw gas transmission methods, gas processing/LNG technologies, sales gas transmission and storage. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering will also focus on economical, environmental, management and safety issues related to natural gas production, processing and transportation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信