The Nottingham health profile: Subjective health status and medical consultations

Sonja M. Hunt, S.P. McKenna, J. McEwen, Jan Williams, Evelyn Papp
{"title":"The Nottingham health profile: Subjective health status and medical consultations","authors":"Sonja M. Hunt,&nbsp;S.P. McKenna,&nbsp;J. McEwen,&nbsp;Jan Williams,&nbsp;Evelyn Papp","doi":"10.1016/0271-7123(81)90005-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The decision to consult a doctor for medical reasons may be assumed to be indicative of the perception of a health problem by the patient. A study was carried out to compare the scores of consulters and non-consulters of a general practice, on the Nottingham Health Profile, which is designed to be a standardized and simple measure of subjective health status in the physical, social and emotional domains. Data on physical activity, absence from work and overall self-rated health were also collected. Each section of the Profile showed significant differences in score between consulters and non-consulters. Significant associations were also found between scores on the Profile and both self-rated health and absence from work. The association between scores and amount of physical activity was less clear cut.</p><p>Females had a lower subjective health status than did males on all sections except those reflecting pain and physical mobility problems. The age-group 40–49 had a lower subjective health status than younger and older groups and for this age group males scored higher than females on sections representing emotional, social and sleep problems.</p><p>The study indicates that the Nottingham Health Profile is a valid and sensitive measure of subjective health, which may well be a better predictor of need for and utilization of health services than “hard” data such as mortality and morbidity statistics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79260,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part A, Medical sociology","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 221-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-7123(81)90005-5","citationCount":"1156","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science & medicine. Part A, Medical sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0271712381900055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1156

Abstract

The decision to consult a doctor for medical reasons may be assumed to be indicative of the perception of a health problem by the patient. A study was carried out to compare the scores of consulters and non-consulters of a general practice, on the Nottingham Health Profile, which is designed to be a standardized and simple measure of subjective health status in the physical, social and emotional domains. Data on physical activity, absence from work and overall self-rated health were also collected. Each section of the Profile showed significant differences in score between consulters and non-consulters. Significant associations were also found between scores on the Profile and both self-rated health and absence from work. The association between scores and amount of physical activity was less clear cut.

Females had a lower subjective health status than did males on all sections except those reflecting pain and physical mobility problems. The age-group 40–49 had a lower subjective health status than younger and older groups and for this age group males scored higher than females on sections representing emotional, social and sleep problems.

The study indicates that the Nottingham Health Profile is a valid and sensitive measure of subjective health, which may well be a better predictor of need for and utilization of health services than “hard” data such as mortality and morbidity statistics.

诺丁汉健康概况:主观健康状况和医疗咨询
出于医疗原因而去看医生的决定可被认为表明病人对健康问题的认识。开展了一项研究,比较咨询师和非咨询师在《诺丁汉健康概况》上的得分。《诺丁汉健康概况》旨在对身体、社会和情感领域的主观健康状况进行标准化和简单的衡量。研究人员还收集了有关身体活动、缺勤和总体自我评估健康状况的数据。在个人资料的每个部分,咨询者和非咨询者的得分都有显著差异。个人资料的得分与自我评估的健康状况和缺勤情况之间也存在显著关联。得分和运动量之间的关系不太明确。除了反映疼痛和身体活动问题的部分外,女性的主观健康状况在所有部分都低于男性。40-49岁年龄组的主观健康状况低于年轻人和老年人,在这个年龄组中,男性在情感、社交和睡眠问题方面的得分高于女性。研究表明,诺丁汉健康概况是主观健康的一种有效和敏感的衡量标准,它很可能比死亡率和发病率统计等“硬”数据更好地预测对卫生服务的需求和利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信