Saccadic eye movements in frontal lesion and posthemispherectomy in humans. An electro-oculographic study.

Acta neurologica latinoamericana Pub Date : 1981-01-01
J Bogacz, M D Bottinelli, M Pebet, A Bogacz
{"title":"Saccadic eye movements in frontal lesion and posthemispherectomy in humans. An electro-oculographic study.","authors":"J Bogacz,&nbsp;M D Bottinelli,&nbsp;M Pebet,&nbsp;A Bogacz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was concerned with the assumed role that the frontal eye fields could play in the mechanisms of: the voluntary saccade optokinetic responses. Ten patients with frontal lobe tumors (8 unilateral, 2 bilateral) and two patients with a right hemispherectomy were studied. EOG and EEG were performed in the same session. Left and right voluntary saccadic potentials could be recorded in all cases, no matter where the frontal lesion was located. Minor differences in amplitude were observed between the fast eye movement to the lesion and to the normal side. Horizontal optokinetic responses to a moving drum were a constant finding in all cases. The frequency and amplitude of the fast component of the responses did not show substantial differences with the drum moving to the lesion or to the healthy side. Voluntary saccadic eye movements to the left and left horizontal optokinetic responses to a moving drum to the right, were recorded in the two cases with a right hemispherectomy. The hypothesis that considers frontal eye field as the pulse generator area for the voluntary or reflex saccadic eye movements is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":75394,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica latinoamericana","volume":"27 1-2","pages":"61-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica latinoamericana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was concerned with the assumed role that the frontal eye fields could play in the mechanisms of: the voluntary saccade optokinetic responses. Ten patients with frontal lobe tumors (8 unilateral, 2 bilateral) and two patients with a right hemispherectomy were studied. EOG and EEG were performed in the same session. Left and right voluntary saccadic potentials could be recorded in all cases, no matter where the frontal lesion was located. Minor differences in amplitude were observed between the fast eye movement to the lesion and to the normal side. Horizontal optokinetic responses to a moving drum were a constant finding in all cases. The frequency and amplitude of the fast component of the responses did not show substantial differences with the drum moving to the lesion or to the healthy side. Voluntary saccadic eye movements to the left and left horizontal optokinetic responses to a moving drum to the right, were recorded in the two cases with a right hemispherectomy. The hypothesis that considers frontal eye field as the pulse generator area for the voluntary or reflex saccadic eye movements is discussed.

人类额叶病变和脑半球切除术后的跳跃性眼球运动。眼电学研究
本研究探讨了额叶视野在自发性扫视光动力反应机制中可能起的作用。本文对10例额叶肿瘤患者(8例单侧,2例双侧)和2例右半球切除术患者进行了研究。EOG和EEG同时进行。在所有病例中,无论额叶病变位于何处,均可记录左、右随意跳眼电位。在快速眼动到病变侧和正常侧之间观察到轻微的振幅差异。在所有情况下,对移动鼓的水平光动力学响应都是一个恒定的发现。快速响应分量的频率和振幅在鼓向病变或健康侧移动时没有显着差异。在右半球切除术的两例患者中,记录了自发的向左和向右移动的鼓的跳眼运动和左水平光动力学反应。讨论了视额眼野为自发性或反射性跳眼运动脉冲产生区的假说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信