Clinical investigations into antidepressive mechanisms. I. Antihistaminic and cholinolytic effects: amitriptyline versus promethazine.

H Beckmann, M Schmauss
{"title":"Clinical investigations into antidepressive mechanisms. I. Antihistaminic and cholinolytic effects: amitriptyline versus promethazine.","authors":"H Beckmann,&nbsp;M Schmauss","doi":"10.1007/BF00540037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is assumed that established antidepressants exert their clinical efficacy by potentiation or decrease of central noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission. However, recent experimental work suggests that antihistaminic and/or cholinolytic effects may also be involved. This double-blind controlled study compared amitriptyline (catecholamine potentiating, antihistaminic, cholinolytic) with promethazine (antihistaminic, cholinolytic) in 50 severely depressed inpatients over a 30-day treatment period. Analysis of the Hamilton depression rating scale revealed significant clinical superiority of amitriptyline over promethazine in such major depressive symptoms as depressed mood, suicidal ideation, psychic anxiety, and sleep disturbances. No significant difference was evident as far as autonomous side effects were concerned. Similar results were found by analysis of the AMP rating system. It is concluded that antihistaminic or cholinolytic effects per se do not explain the antidepressants' efficacy. However, potentiation of noradrenergic neurotransmission by cholinolytic activity might be the major antidepressive mechanism.</p>","PeriodicalId":55482,"journal":{"name":"Archiv Fur Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten","volume":"233 1","pages":"59-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00540037","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv Fur Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

It is assumed that established antidepressants exert their clinical efficacy by potentiation or decrease of central noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission. However, recent experimental work suggests that antihistaminic and/or cholinolytic effects may also be involved. This double-blind controlled study compared amitriptyline (catecholamine potentiating, antihistaminic, cholinolytic) with promethazine (antihistaminic, cholinolytic) in 50 severely depressed inpatients over a 30-day treatment period. Analysis of the Hamilton depression rating scale revealed significant clinical superiority of amitriptyline over promethazine in such major depressive symptoms as depressed mood, suicidal ideation, psychic anxiety, and sleep disturbances. No significant difference was evident as far as autonomous side effects were concerned. Similar results were found by analysis of the AMP rating system. It is concluded that antihistaminic or cholinolytic effects per se do not explain the antidepressants' efficacy. However, potentiation of noradrenergic neurotransmission by cholinolytic activity might be the major antidepressive mechanism.

抗抑郁机制的临床研究。抗组胺和胆碱溶解作用:阿米替林与异丙嗪。
假设已建立的抗抑郁药物通过增强或减少中枢去甲肾上腺素能和血清素能神经传递来发挥其临床疗效。然而,最近的实验工作表明,抗组胺和/或胆碱溶解作用也可能涉及。这项双盲对照研究比较了阿米替林(儿茶酚胺增强、抗组胺、溶胆碱)和异丙嗪(抗组胺、溶胆碱)在50例重度抑郁症住院患者中30天治疗期间的疗效。汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表分析显示,阿米替林在抑郁情绪、自杀意念、精神焦虑和睡眠障碍等重度抑郁症状方面明显优于异丙嗪。在自主副作用方面,两组无显著性差异。通过对AMP评级系统的分析,也发现了类似的结果。结论是抗组胺或胆碱溶解作用本身不能解释抗抑郁药的疗效。然而,通过胆碱溶解活性增强去甲肾上腺素能神经传递可能是抗抑郁的主要机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信