[Termino-lateral anastomosis of the carotid of the rat. Histological evaluation of permeability in relation to the number of suture stitches and the thread used].

Acta neurologica latinoamericana Pub Date : 1980-01-01
A Calvo, J A Purriel
{"title":"[Termino-lateral anastomosis of the carotid of the rat. Histological evaluation of permeability in relation to the number of suture stitches and the thread used].","authors":"A Calvo,&nbsp;J A Purriel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A histological study of end-to-side anastomosis on the carotid arteries of the rat, is presented comparing the results according to the type of suture material and the number of stitches. Two groups of 5 animals were studied. Group \"A\" in which the 11-0 monofilament nylon (18 microns; needle of 70 microns) was utilized with an average of 11 stitches; and group \"B\" corresponding to the 10-0 nylon (25 microns; needle of 100 microns) with an average of 8 stitches. The patency of the anastomosis was ascertain in all cases except one where a complete thrombosis of the donor artery was discovered. The fact that there were no difference between both groups is stressed. Other findings were: dehiscence, 3; invagination, 3; partial thrombosis, 4 in spite of actual patency. It was concluded that the 10-0 nylon is easier to handle, and 8 stitches are enough to perform and end-to-side anastomosis in 1mm diameter arteries. A regular distance among the stitches and a balanced tension of knotting are important to prevent or to diminish the risk of dehiscence, first range factor of occlusive thrombosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":75394,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica latinoamericana","volume":"26 4","pages":"215-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica latinoamericana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A histological study of end-to-side anastomosis on the carotid arteries of the rat, is presented comparing the results according to the type of suture material and the number of stitches. Two groups of 5 animals were studied. Group "A" in which the 11-0 monofilament nylon (18 microns; needle of 70 microns) was utilized with an average of 11 stitches; and group "B" corresponding to the 10-0 nylon (25 microns; needle of 100 microns) with an average of 8 stitches. The patency of the anastomosis was ascertain in all cases except one where a complete thrombosis of the donor artery was discovered. The fact that there were no difference between both groups is stressed. Other findings were: dehiscence, 3; invagination, 3; partial thrombosis, 4 in spite of actual patency. It was concluded that the 10-0 nylon is easier to handle, and 8 stitches are enough to perform and end-to-side anastomosis in 1mm diameter arteries. A regular distance among the stitches and a balanced tension of knotting are important to prevent or to diminish the risk of dehiscence, first range factor of occlusive thrombosis.

大鼠颈动脉终侧吻合。透气性的组织学评价与缝线数和所用线的关系。
对大鼠颈动脉端侧吻合进行组织学研究,根据缝合材料的种类和缝合针数对吻合结果进行比较。实验分为两组,每组5只。“A”组,其中11-0单丝尼龙(18微米;针径70微米,平均11针;“B”组对应10-0尼龙(25微米);针(100微米),平均8针。除一例供体动脉完全血栓形成外,所有病例吻合口均通畅。强调两组之间没有差异的事实。其他发现包括:裂开,3分;内陷,3;部分血栓,4例,尽管实际通畅。结论:10-0尼龙更易操作,8针足以完成直径1mm动脉端侧吻合。有规律的缝线距离和平衡的打结张力对于预防或减少裂缝的风险是重要的,这是闭塞性血栓形成的第一个范围因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信