Nomifensine and maprotiline in endogenous depression: comparative efficacy and side effects.

A Levin
{"title":"Nomifensine and maprotiline in endogenous depression: comparative efficacy and side effects.","authors":"A Levin","doi":"10.1159/000468603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>50 patients suffering from endogenous depression were admitted to a double-blind study comparing the efficacy of nomifensine and maprotiline and the side effects associated with treatment. A total of 28 patients, 14 on nomifensine and 14 on maprotiline completed the study. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated by means of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression before administering the drugs and on days 7, 14, 21 and 28. Also noted if present was the day on which marked improvement was reported. At each assessment period incidence and severity of side effects were registered. On the basis of this study, nomifensine and maprotiline were both found clinically to have marked antidepressant action. The difference in response did not reach statistical significance, although there was a trend towards better improvement on nomifensine at the end of the 1st and 4th weeks. There was a rapid onset of action with both compounds. Significantly more severe side effects developed in those patients treated with maprotiline compared to those treated with nomifensine.</p>","PeriodicalId":75943,"journal":{"name":"International pharmacopsychiatry","volume":"17 Suppl 1 ","pages":"89-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000468603","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International pharmacopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000468603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

50 patients suffering from endogenous depression were admitted to a double-blind study comparing the efficacy of nomifensine and maprotiline and the side effects associated with treatment. A total of 28 patients, 14 on nomifensine and 14 on maprotiline completed the study. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated by means of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression before administering the drugs and on days 7, 14, 21 and 28. Also noted if present was the day on which marked improvement was reported. At each assessment period incidence and severity of side effects were registered. On the basis of this study, nomifensine and maprotiline were both found clinically to have marked antidepressant action. The difference in response did not reach statistical significance, although there was a trend towards better improvement on nomifensine at the end of the 1st and 4th weeks. There was a rapid onset of action with both compounds. Significantly more severe side effects developed in those patients treated with maprotiline compared to those treated with nomifensine.

诺非芬与马普替林治疗内源性抑郁症的疗效及副作用比较。
50例内源性抑郁症患者接受了一项双盲研究,比较诺非芬和马普替林的疗效和治疗相关的副作用。共有28例患者完成了研究,其中14例使用诺非芬,14例使用马普替林。用药前及用药第7、14、21、28天采用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表评定疗效。还指出,如果报告有明显改善的日期。在每个评估期记录副作用的发生率和严重程度。在本研究的基础上,临床上发现诺非芬和马普替林均具有显著的抗抑郁作用。两组疗效差异无统计学意义,但诺米芬在第1周和第4周有改善趋势。两种化合物都能迅速起效。与诺非芬治疗的患者相比,接受马普替林治疗的患者出现了更严重的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信