[Self-evaluation questionnaires--factorial structure and indications for general practice].

V Hobi
{"title":"[Self-evaluation questionnaires--factorial structure and indications for general practice].","authors":"V Hobi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The following self-rating inventories were administered to 613 subjects (289 psychically ill patients and 324 healthy persons): The Basel Mood Inventory (BBI), the Freiburg Personality Inventory (FPI), the Giessen-Test (GT), the Complaint-List (HHM), and the Paranoid-Neuroticism-Depression-Scale (PND-S'). The main interest was put on examining the dimensionality of each inventory separately and all the inventories combined. The results are discussed with respect to the practical applicability. FPI and GT proved as two polyvalently applicable personality inventories (clinically as well as non-clinically) whose factorial structure is essentially verified. It was justified to eliminate \"N\" (neuroticism) from the PND in the newly revised version. Although \"P\" (paranoid) covers only a particular domain of paranoid tendencies the new test version (PD and PD') will be valuable in clinical use for group differentiation (a.o. for global diagnoses of depression and schizophrenia) in longitudinal as well as cross-sectional studies. The HHM covers mood state variables additionally, little differentiated though. The newer parallel forms suffer from the same deficiency. It could be confirmed that the BBI measures a particular mood-drive dimension and thus can be used independently or in combination with multidimensional personality inventories in longitudinal studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21430,"journal":{"name":"Schweizer Archiv fur Neurologie, Neurochirurgie und Psychiatrie = Archives suisses de neurologie, neurochirurgie et de psychiatrie","volume":"134 1","pages":"131-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizer Archiv fur Neurologie, Neurochirurgie und Psychiatrie = Archives suisses de neurologie, neurochirurgie et de psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The following self-rating inventories were administered to 613 subjects (289 psychically ill patients and 324 healthy persons): The Basel Mood Inventory (BBI), the Freiburg Personality Inventory (FPI), the Giessen-Test (GT), the Complaint-List (HHM), and the Paranoid-Neuroticism-Depression-Scale (PND-S'). The main interest was put on examining the dimensionality of each inventory separately and all the inventories combined. The results are discussed with respect to the practical applicability. FPI and GT proved as two polyvalently applicable personality inventories (clinically as well as non-clinically) whose factorial structure is essentially verified. It was justified to eliminate "N" (neuroticism) from the PND in the newly revised version. Although "P" (paranoid) covers only a particular domain of paranoid tendencies the new test version (PD and PD') will be valuable in clinical use for group differentiation (a.o. for global diagnoses of depression and schizophrenia) in longitudinal as well as cross-sectional studies. The HHM covers mood state variables additionally, little differentiated though. The newer parallel forms suffer from the same deficiency. It could be confirmed that the BBI measures a particular mood-drive dimension and thus can be used independently or in combination with multidimensional personality inventories in longitudinal studies.

[自我评价问卷-析因结构和一般实践适应症]。
对613名受试者(289名精神病患者和324名健康人)进行了以下自评量表:巴塞尔情绪量表(BBI)、弗莱堡人格量表(FPI)、吉森测验(GT)、抱怨表(HHM)和偏执-神经质-抑郁量表(PND-S)。主要关注的是对每个清单的维度进行单独检查,并对所有清单进行组合检查。从实际应用的角度对所得结果进行了讨论。FPI和GT被证明是两种多价适用的人格量表(临床和非临床),其析因结构基本上得到了验证。在新修订的版本中,从PND中删除“N”(神经质)是合理的。虽然“P”(偏执)只涵盖偏执倾向的一个特定领域,但新的测试版本(PD和PD’)将在纵向和横断面研究中用于群体区分(也可用于抑郁症和精神分裂症的全球诊断)的临床应用中具有价值。HHM还涵盖了情绪状态变量,但差别不大。较新的平行形式也有同样的缺陷。可以肯定的是,BBI测量的是一个特定的情绪驱动维度,因此可以单独使用,也可以与纵向研究中的多维人格量表结合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信